Literature DB >> 1697602

Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

J Moncada1, J Schachter, G Bolan, J Engelman, L Howard, I Mushahwar, G Ridgway, G Mumtaz, W Stamm, A Clark.   

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassays for the detection of chlamydial antigens are commonly used to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection. As is true for all nonculture methods, the specificities of these tests are a concern. A confirmatory blocking assay (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) was evaluated at four sexually transmitted disease test sites. This assay is designed to confirm true-positive Chlamydiazyme (CZ) specimens and to identify false-positive CZ reactions caused by cross-reacting bacteria. Cervical specimens were collected from 2,891 women. Chlamydia prevalence by tissue culture (TC) was 9.2% (266 of 2,891 specimens). Compared with TC, the sensitivity and specificity of CZ were 78.9% (210 of 266 specimens) and 98.2% (2,577 of 2,625 specimens), respectively. There were 48 CZ false-positive reactions. The direct fluorescent-antibody test (DFA) was positive for 31 of 48 false-positive reactions, indicating culture misses. Thus, when the standard was both TC and DFA, CZ sensitivity was 81.1% and CZ specificity was 99.3%. Of the 17 CZ-positive patients who were negative by both TC and DFA, 3 were negative on repeat CZ and 11 of 14 were identified as false positive by the confirmatory assay. The confirmatory test was positive for CZ-positive women who were positive by TC or DFA. Use of the confirmatory test, which increased the specificity to 99.9%, would increase confidence in positive CZ results and make the test more useful for screening populations with a low prevalence of C. trachomatis infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1697602      PMCID: PMC268045          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.8.1770-1773.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; M Shipp; G Bolan; J Wilber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  K C Mohanty; J J O'Neill; M H Hambling
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1986-06

3.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Nonculture methods for diagnosing chlamydial infection in patients with trachoma: a clue to the pathogenesis of the disease?

Authors:  J Schachter; J Moncada; C R Dawson; J Sheppard; P Courtright; M E Said; S Zaki; S F Hafez; A Lorincz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  False positive results with the use of chlamydial antigen detection tests in the evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in children.

Authors:  M R Hammerschlag; P J Rettig; M E Shields
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Diagnosis of chlamydial infection in women attending antenatal and gynecologic clinics.

Authors:  J W Smith; R E Rogers; B P Katz; J F Brickler; P L Lineback; B Van der Pol; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.

Authors:  K T Ripa; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Immunodiagnosis of sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct
View more
  36 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  H Hallander; P Jonsson; B Gästrin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Preliminary evaluation of "Clearview Chlamydia" for the rapid detection of chlamydial antigen in cervical secretions.

Authors:  H Young; A Moyes; H Lough; I W Smith; J G McKenna; C Thompson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

6.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  T W Williams; S D Tyler; S Giercke; D R Pollard; P McNicol; K R Rozee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.

Authors:  L M Clarke; M F Sierra; B J Daidone; N Lopez; J M Covino; W M McCormack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.