Literature DB >> 7410229

Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions.

D T Kemp, R Chum.   

Abstract

In Part I, the sound emitting properties of the peripheral auditory system are briefly reviewed and links with other literature are cited. (Summary of Symposium section introduction). In Part II, the stimulation of acoustic emissions by clicks is examined experimentally and analytically, in order to specify the physical qualities and parameters of the unknown generator which may be considered as driving the ear drum. Special attention is paid to absolute magnitudes to the qualitative interpretation of the generator's nonlinear properties and to the extent of inter-stimulus interactions in the time and frequency domains. New transient suppression results are presented. From the observations made, and without reference to the likely cochlear origin of the phenomenon, it is deduced that the generator is a multiple channel system, with each channel consisting of at least a steep-sloped narrow band filter followed by a fast acting compressive nonlinearity. A secondary nonlinearity seems also to be present, of a form which requires the filter itself to be nonlinear. The maximum power output of the generator is of the order 0.26 X 10(-12) W.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7410229     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(80)90059-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Is there a close relationship between changes in amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell damage after exposure to realistic industrial noise in guinea pigs?

Authors:  V Linss; E Emmerich; F Richter; W Linss
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Auditory brainstem circuits that mediate the middle ear muscle reflex.

Authors:  Sudeep Mukerji; Alanna Marie Windsor; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09-23

3.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Can a Static Nonlinearity Account for the Dynamics of Otoacoustic Emission Suppression?

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2011-11

7.  Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  A Moleti; R Sisto
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-09

8.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 10.  Otoacoustic emissions: a new method to diagnose hearing impairment in children.

Authors:  P G Zorowka
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.