Literature DB >> 19045653

Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.

Glenis R Long1, Carrick L Talmadge, Jungmee Lee.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level from normal hearing individuals can vary by as much as 30 dB with small frequency changes (a phenomenon known as DPOAE fine structure). This fine structure is hypothesized to stem from the interaction of components from two different regions of the cochlea (the nonlinear generator region and the reflection component from the DP region). An efficient procedure to separate these two components would improve the clinical and research utility of DPOAE by permitting separate evaluation of different cochlea regions. In this paper, two procedures for evaluating DPOAE fine structure are compared: DPOAE generated by fixed-frequency primaries versus continuously sweeping primaries. The sweep DPOAE data are analyzed with a least squares fit filter. Sweep rates of greater than 8 s per octave permit rapid evaluation of the cochlear fine structure. A higher sweep rate of 2 s per octave provided DPOAE without fine structure. Under these conditions, the longer latency reflection component falls outside the range of the filter. Consequently, DPOAE obtained with sweeping tones can be used either to get more rapid estimates of DPOAE fine structure or to obtain estimates of DPOAE from the generator region uncontaminated by energy from the reflection region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045653     DOI: 10.1121/1.2949505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  59 in total

1.  Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Exploiting Dual Otoacoustic Emission Sources.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015

10.  Effects of selective auditory-nerve damage on the behavioral audiogram and temporal integration in the budgerigar.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wong; Kristina S Abrams; Kassidy N Amburgey; Yingxuan Wang; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.