Literature DB >> 27506221

Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Liang-Dar Hwang1,2, Paul A S Breslin3,4, Danielle R Reed3, Gu Zhu1, Nicholas G Martin1, Margaret J Wright5,6.   

Abstract

Perceived intensities of sweetness and bitterness are correlated with one another and each is influenced by genetics. The extent to which these correlations share common genetic variation, however, remains unclear. In a mainly adolescent sample ( n = 1901, mean age 16.2 years), including 243 monozygotic (MZ) and 452 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, we estimated the covariance among the perceived intensities of 4 bitter compounds (6- n -propylthiouracil [PROP], sucrose octa-acetate, quinine, caffeine) and 4 sweeteners (the weighted mean ratings of glucose, fructose, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone, aspartame) with multivariate genetic modeling. The sweetness factor was moderately correlated with sucrose octa-acetate, quinine, and caffeine ( rp = 0.35-0.40). This was mainly due to a shared genetic factor ( rg = 0.46-0.51) that accounted for 17-37% of the variance in the 3 bitter compounds' ratings and 8% of the variance in general sweetness ratings. In contrast, an association between sweetness and PROP only became evident after adjusting for the TAS2R38 diplotype ( rp increased from 0.18 to 0.32) with the PROP genetic factor accounting for 6% of variance in sweetness. These genetic associations were not inflated by scale use bias, as the cross-trait correlations for both MZ and DZ twins were weak. There was also little evidence for mediation by cognition or behavioral factors. This suggests an overlap of genetic variance between perceptions of sweetness and bitterness from a variety of stimuli, which includes PROP when considering the TAS2R38 diplotype. The most likely sources of shared variation are within genes encoding post-receptor transduction mechanisms common to the various taste G protein-coupled receptors.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IQ; TAS2R38; personality; sweetener; taste; twins

Year:  2016        PMID: 27506221      PMCID: PMC5070489          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjw083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  41 in total

1.  Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; S A Henderson; A B Shore; A Barratt-Fornell
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-09

2.  'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Pravin George
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin.

Authors:  G T Wong; K S Gannon; R F Margolskee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A common genetic influence on human intensity ratings of sugars and high-potency sweeteners.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Gu Zhu; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Fat perception is related to PROP taster status.

Authors:  B J Tepper; R J Nurse
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-06

Review 6.  Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-07

7.  PROP (6-n-Propylthiouracil) tasting and sensory responses to caffeine,sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and chocolate.

Authors:  A Ly; A Drewnowski
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hansen; Danielle R Reed; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations.

Authors:  Martha R Bajec; Gary J Pickering
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-08-22

10.  GWAS of human bitter taste perception identifies new loci and reveals additional complexity of bitter taste genetics.

Authors:  Mirko Ledda; Zoltán Kutalik; Maria C Souza Destito; Milena M Souza; Cintia A Cirillo; Amabilene Zamboni; Nathalie Martin; Edgard Morya; Koichi Sameshima; Jacques S Beckmann; Johannes le Coutre; Sven Bergmann; Ulrich K Genick
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  7 in total

1.  A genome-wide association study of bitter and sweet beverage consumption.

Authors:  Victor W Zhong; Alan Kuang; Rebecca D Danning; Peter Kraft; Rob M van Dam; Daniel I Chasman; Marilyn C Cornelis
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  New insight into human sweet taste: a genome-wide association study of the perception and intake of sweet substances.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Cailu Lin; Puya Gharahkhani; Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Jue-Sheng Ong; Jiyuan An; Scott D Gordon; Gu Zhu; Stuart MacGregor; Deborah A Lawlor; Paul A S Breslin; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Associations between brain structure and perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Lachlan T Strike; Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie McMahon; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Paternal grandmother's smoking in pregnancy is associated with extreme aversion to bitter taste in their grandchildren.

Authors:  Jean Golding; Marcus E Pembrey; Steven Gregory; Matthew Suderman; Yasmin Iles-Caven; Kate Northstone
Journal:  Environ Epigenet       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence.

Authors:  Andrea D Smith; Alison Fildes; Suzanna Forwood; Lucy Cooke; Clare Llewellyn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Neuroimaging, neuromodulation, and population health: the neuroscience of chronic disease prevention.

Authors:  Peter A Hall; Warren K Bickel; Kirk I Erickson; Dylan D Wagner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Bivariate genome-wide association analysis strengthens the role of bitter receptor clusters on chromosomes 7 and 12 in human bitter taste.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Puya Gharahkhani; Paul A S Breslin; Scott D Gordon; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Danielle R Reed; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.