Literature DB >> 16527870

Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine.

Jonathan L Hansen1, Danielle R Reed, Margaret J Wright, Nicholas G Martin, Paul A S Breslin.   

Abstract

The perceived bitterness intensity for bitter solutions of propylthiouracil (PROP), sucrose octa-acetate (SOA), quinine HCl and caffeine were examined in a genetically informative sample of 392 females and 313 males (mean age of 17.8 +/- 3.1 years), including 62 monozygotic and 131 dizygotic twin pairs and 237 sib pairs. Broad-sense heritabilities were estimated at 0.72, 0.28, 0.34, and 0.30 for PROP, SOA, quinine, and caffeine, respectively, for perceived intensity measures. Modeling showed 1) a group factor which explained a large amount of the genetic variation in SOA, quinine, and caffeine (22-28% phenotypic variation), 2) a factor responsible for all the genetic variation in PROP (72% phenotypic variation), which only accounted for 1% and 2% of the phenotypic variation in SOA and caffeine, respectively, and 3) a modest specific genetic factor for quinine (12% phenotypic variation). Unique environmental influences for all four compounds were due to a single factor responsible for 7-22% of phenotypic variation. The results suggest that the perception of PROP and the perception of SOA, quinine, and caffeine are influenced by two distinct sets of genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527870      PMCID: PMC1475779          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjj044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  41 in total

1.  High-resolution genetic mapping of the sucrose octaacetate taste aversion (Soa) locus on mouse Chromosome 6.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; X Li; S Li; M Neira; G K Beauchamp; E A Azen
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  A genomewide scan for intelligence identifies quantitative trait loci on 2q and 6p.

Authors:  Danielle Posthuma; Michelle Luciano; Eco J C de Geus; Margie J Wright; P Eline Slagboom; Grant W Montgomery; Dorret I Boomsma; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals.

Authors:  J F Delwiche; Z Buletic; P A Breslin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-10

4.  Genetic analysis of a complex trait in the Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p.

Authors:  Dennis Drayna; Hilary Coon; Un-Kyung Kim; Tami Elsner; Kevin Cromer; Brith Otterud; Lisa Baird; Andy P Peiffer; Mark Leppert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception.

Authors:  I J Miller; F E Reedy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-06

6.  Behavioral specificity of the bitter taste gene Soa.

Authors:  J D Boughter; G Whitney
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-12-31

7.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Variation in intake of sweet and bitter solutions by inbred strains of golden hamsters.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Yumiko Wada; Junshiro Makino; Makoto Mizutani; Hidehiko Umezawa; Yasutomi Katsuie; Thomas P Hettinger; David A Blizard
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Taste perception of bitter compounds in young and elderly persons: relation to lipophilicity of bitter compounds.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; L A Gatlin; A E Frey; S A Heiman; W C Stagner; D C Cooper
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis.

Authors:  J F Aitken; A Green; A Eldridge; L Green; J Pfitzner; D Battistutta; N G Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of caffeine consumption and responses to caffeine.

Authors:  Amy Yang; Abraham A Palmer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells.

Authors:  Sarah V Lipchock; Julie A Mennella; Andrew I Spielman; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.

Authors:  Danielle Renee Reed; Antti Knaapila
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

5.  Twin study of the heritability of recognition thresholds for sour and salty taste.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Jonathan L Hansen; Danielle R Reed; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  A genome-wide study on the perception of the odorants androstenone and galaxolide.

Authors:  Antti Knaapila; Gu Zhu; Sarah E Medland; Charles J Wysocki; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Genetic differences in the behavioral organization of binge eating, conditioned food reward, and compulsive-like eating in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains.

Authors:  Richard K Babbs; Julia C Kelliher; Julia L Scotellaro; Kimberly P Luttik; Megan K Mulligan; Camron D Bryant
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-09-24

8.  Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Veronica Galindo-Cuspinera; Thierry Waeber; Nicolas Antille; Christoph Hartmann; Nicola Stead; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Sensory characterization of the irritant properties of oleocanthal, a natural anti-inflammatory agent in extra virgin olive oils.

Authors:  Sara Cicerale; Paul A S Breslin; Gary K Beauchamp; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.