Literature DB >> 15337686

'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor.

Barry G Green1, Pravin George.   

Abstract

Individual differences in taste perception have been explained in part by variations in peripheral innervation associated with the genetic ability to taste the bitter substances PTC and PROP. In the present study we report evidence of another source of individual differences that is independent of taste stimulus, taste quality, or gustatory nerve. Individuals who perceived taste from thermal stimulation alone (thermal taste) gave significantly higher taste ratings to chemical stimuli--often by a factor of >2:1--than did individuals who perceived no taste from thermal stimulation. This was true for all taste stimuli tested (sucrose, saccharin, sodium chloride, citric acid, quinine sulfate, MSG and PROP), for all three gustatory areas of the mouth (anterior tongue, posterior tongue and soft palate) and for whole-mouth stimulation. Moreover, the same individuals reported stronger sensations from the olfactory stimulus vanillin, particularly when it was sensed retronasally. The generality of the thermal-taster advantage and its extension to an olfactory stimulus suggests that it arises from individual differences in CNS processes that are involved in perception of both taste and flavor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15337686     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  26 in total

1.  The Effect of Temperature on Umami Taste.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Cynthia Alvarado; Kendra Andrew; Danielle Nachtigal
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  In pursuit of taste phenotypes.

Authors:  Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Somatosensory factors in taste perception: effects of active tasting and solution temperature.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Danielle Nachtigal
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-05-17

5.  Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.

Authors:  Danielle Nachtigal; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Water restriction and fluid temperature alter preference for water and sucrose solutions.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Michelle B Bales; Joseph M Breza; Thomas A Houpt; James C Smith; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.