Literature DB >> 26181574

A common genetic influence on human intensity ratings of sugars and high-potency sweeteners.

Liang-Dar Hwang, Gu Zhu, Paul A S Breslin, Danielle R Reed, Nicholas G Martin, Margaret J Wright.   

Abstract

The perception of sweetness varies among individuals but the sources of this variation are not fully understood. Here, in a sample of 1,901 adolescent and young adults (53.8% female; 243 MZ and 452 DZ twin pairs, 511 unpaired individuals; mean age 16.2±2.8, range 12–26 years), we studied the variation in the perception of sweetness intensity of two monosaccharides and two high-potency sweeteners: glucose, fructose, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (NHDC), and aspartame. Perceived intensity for all sweeteners decreased with age (2–5% per year) and increased with the history of otitis media (6–9%). Males rated aspartame slightly stronger than females (7%). We found similar heritabilities for sugars (glucose: h2=0.31, fructose: h2=0.34) and high-potency sweeteners (NHDC: h2=0.31, aspartame: h2=0.30); all were in the modest range. Multivariate modeling showed that a common genetic factor accounted for >75% of the genetic variance in the four sweeteners, suggesting that individual differences in perceived sweet intensity, which are partly due to genetic factors, may be attributed to a single set of genes. This study provided evidence of the shared genetic pathways between the perception of sugars and high-potency sweeteners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26181574     DOI: 10.1017/thg.2015.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  10 in total

1.  Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  New insight into human sweet taste: a genome-wide association study of the perception and intake of sweet substances.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Cailu Lin; Puya Gharahkhani; Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Jue-Sheng Ong; Jiyuan An; Scott D Gordon; Gu Zhu; Stuart MacGregor; Deborah A Lawlor; Paul A S Breslin; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Associations between brain structure and perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes.

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Lachlan T Strike; Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie McMahon; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  The development of sweet taste: From biology to hedonics.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Validation and psychometric properties of the Somatic and Psychological HEalth REport (SPHERE) in a young Australian-based population sample using non-parametric item response theory.

Authors:  Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Tracey A Davenport; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Genetic Background of Taste Perception, Taste Preferences, and Its Nutritional Implications: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Judit Diószegi; Erand Llanaj; Róza Ádány
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Close Proximity to the Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Gene Found to Be Associated with Sugar Intake in a Swedish Population.

Authors:  Suzanne Janzi; Esther González-Padilla; Kevin Najafi; Stina Ramne; Emma Ahlqvist; Yan Borné; Emily Sonestedt
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  The individual environment, not the family is the most important influence on preferences for common non-alcoholic beverages in adolescence.

Authors:  Andrea D Smith; Alison Fildes; Suzanna Forwood; Lucy Cooke; Clare Llewellyn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nineteen and Up study (19Up): understanding pathways to mental health disorders in young Australian twins.

Authors:  Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Victoria O'Callaghan; Nicholas G Martin; Ian B Hickie; Nathan A Gillespie; Richard Parker; Natalie Mills; Katherine M Kirk; Jan Scott; Anna Vinkhuyzen; Daniel F Hermens; Penelope A Lind; Tracey A Davenport; Jane M Burns; Melissa Connell; Brendan P Zietsch; James Scott; Margaret J Wright; Sarah E Medland; John McGrath
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Taste Responses to Linoleic Acid: A Crowdsourced Population Study.

Authors:  Nicole L Garneau; Tiffany M Nuessle; Robin M Tucker; Mengjie Yao; Stephanie A Santorico; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.160

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.