Literature DB >> 9272678

Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet.

A Drewnowski1, S A Henderson, A B Shore, A Barratt-Fornell.   

Abstract

Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) has been reported to predict hedonic response to sweet taste in both women and men. This study was based on a sample of 159 women of different ethnic backgrounds, mean age 27.0 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) 23.2. The women were classified as nontasters (n = 43), regular tasters (n = 70), or supertasters (n = 46) of PROP on the basis of their PROP detection thresholds and the scaling of 5 suprathreshold solutions of PROP and NaCl. Nontasters had thresholds > 1.8 x 10(-4) mol/L PROP and PROP/NaCl ratios < 1.60. Supertasters had thresholds < 3.2 x 10(-5) mol/L PROP and PROP/NaCl ratios > 1.60. Genetic sensitivity to PROP failed to predict sweetness intensity ratings or hedonic response profiles for sucrose solutions. Separating subjects into sucrose "likers" and "dislikers" failed to reveal any significant links to PROP nontaster, taster, or supertaster status in this all-female sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9272678     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00193-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of eating behavior: established and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Eleanor R Grimm; Nanette I Steinle
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 2.  6-n-Propylthiouracil: a genetic marker for taste, with implications for food preference and dietary habits.

Authors:  B J Tepper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic differences in the behavioral organization of binge eating, conditioned food reward, and compulsive-like eating in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains.

Authors:  Richard K Babbs; Julia C Kelliher; Julia L Scotellaro; Kimberly P Luttik; Megan K Mulligan; Camron D Bryant
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-09-24

4.  Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Reliability of a common solution-based taste perception test: implications for validity and a briefer test.

Authors:  S M Coulon; A C Miller; J M Reed; C K Martin
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2011-10-01

6.  Prediction of stevia liking by sucrose liking: Effects of beverage background.

Authors:  Stephanie Oleson; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Behavioral measures of risk tasking, sensation seeking and sensitivity to reward may reflect different motivations for spicy food liking and consumption.

Authors:  Nadia K Byrnes; John E Hayes
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  The association of taste with change in adiposity-related health measures.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Carla R Schubert; Alex Pinto; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; James S Pankow
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 10.  Determinants of Sweetness Preference: A Scoping Review of Human Studies.

Authors:  Carolina Venditti; Kathy Musa-Veloso; Han Youl Lee; Theresa Poon; Alastair Mak; Maryse Darch; Justine Juana; Dylan Fronda; Daniel Noori; Erika Pateman; Maia Jack
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.