Literature DB >> 21851828

Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand?

John E Hayes1, Russell S J Keast.   

Abstract

Oral chemosensation can vary greatly across individuals, both in terms of the lowest concentration that can be detected (threshold) and in the magnitude of perceived intensity for stimuli at higher concentrations (suprathreshold response). Individuals who experience greater taste intensity are often termed supertasters, and this phenotype has typically been measured via the suprathreshold bitterness of the tastant propylthiouracil (PROP). Notably, supertasting extends beyond bitterness and other tastants to include oral somatosensation and retronasal olfaction, and it may also include finer acuity as well. Here, we describe the evolution of the supertasting concept over the last 20 years, and summarize the current state of the field. Alternative phenotyping approaches that are not dependent on PROP are reviewed, and the molecular genetics of broadly tuned heightened taste and orosensory response are discussed. We conclude by initiating a conversation on nomenclature as we look toward the next 20 years of chemosensory research.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21851828      PMCID: PMC3183330          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  39 in total

1.  Individual differences in perception of bitterness from capsaicin, piperine and zingerone.

Authors:  Barry G Green; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Thermal stimulation of taste.

Authors:  A Cruz; B G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype.

Authors:  Carla Calò; Alessandra Padiglia; Andrea Zonza; Laura Corrias; Paolo Contu; Beverly J Tepper; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-25

5.  Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Bridget S Sullivan; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-07

6.  Vegetable Intake in College-Aged Adults Is Explained by Oral Sensory Phenotypes and TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Andrew C Davidson; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Julie M Peterson; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-09-15

8.  A psychophysical investigation of binary bitter-compound interactions.

Authors:  Russell S J Keast; Melanie M E Bournazel; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Propylthiouracil tasting: determination of underlying threshold distributions using maximum likelihood.

Authors:  D R Reed; L M Bartoshuk; V Duffy; S Marino; R A Price
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Specific alleles of bitter receptor genes influence human sensitivity to the bitterness of aloin and saccharin.

Authors:  Alexey N Pronin; Hong Xu; Huixian Tang; Lan Zhang; Qing Li; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  30 in total

1.  The associations between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) intensity and taste intensities differ by TAS2R38 haplotype.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; James S Pankow; Nathan Pankratz; Carla R Schubert; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Alex Pinto
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2015-01-27

2.  Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Do polymorphisms in the TAS1R1 gene contribute to broader differences in human taste intensity?

Authors:  Shristi Rawal; John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Masking Vegetable Bitterness to Improve Palatability Depends on Vegetable Type and Taste Phenotype.

Authors:  Mastaneh Sharafi; John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods.

Authors:  Erin E Fleming; Gregory R Ziegler; John E Hayes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-27

10.  Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney; Alissa L Allen
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.