Literature DB >> 27503495

Blinded predictions of host-guest standard free energies of binding in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Stefano Bosisio1, Antonia S J S Mey1, Julien Michel2.   

Abstract

In the context of the SAMPL5 blinded challenge standard free energies of binding were predicted for a dataset of 22 small guest molecules and three different host molecules octa-acids (OAH and OAMe) and a cucurbituril (CBC). Three sets of predictions were submitted, each based on different variations of classical molecular dynamics alchemical free energy calculation protocols based on the double annihilation method. The first model (model A) yields a free energy of binding based on computed free energy changes in solvated and host-guest complex phases; the second (model B) adds long range dispersion corrections to the previous result; the third (model C) uses an additional standard state correction term to account for the use of distance restraints during the molecular dynamics simulations. Model C performs the best in terms of mean unsigned error for all guests (MUE [Formula: see text]-95 % confidence interval) for the whole data set and in particular for the octa-acid systems (MUE [Formula: see text]). The overall correlation with experimental data for all models is encouraging ([Formula: see text]). The correlation between experimental and computational free energy of binding ranks as one of the highest with respect to other entries in the challenge. Nonetheless the large MUE for the best performing model highlights systematic errors, and submissions from other groups fared better with respect to this metric.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding free energies; Host-guest systems; SAMPL5

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27503495     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9933-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  40 in total

1.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; Sarah E Boyce; Marcus Fischer; Inbar Fish; David L Mobley; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Current and emerging opportunities for molecular simulations in structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Julien Michel
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Blinded predictions of distribution coefficients in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Stefano Bosisio; Antonia S J S Mey; Julien Michel
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  13 in total

1.  The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Michail Papadourakis; Stefano Bosisio; Julien Michel
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Data-Driven Mapping of Gas-Phase Quantum Calculations to General Force Field Lennard-Jones Parameters.

Authors:  Sophie M Kantonen; Hari S Muddana; Michael Schauperl; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Bind3P: Optimization of a Water Model Based on Host-Guest Binding Data.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; Hari S Muddana; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 6.  Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Kalistyn H Burley; Michael Chiu; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Approaches for calculating solvation free energies and enthalpies demonstrated with an update of the FreeSolv database.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; Daisy Y Kyu; Hannes H Loeffler; John D Chodera; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.