Literature DB >> 30159717

Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Michail Papadourakis1, Stefano Bosisio1, Julien Michel2.   

Abstract

In the context of the SAMPL6 challenges, series of blinded predictions of standard binding free energies were made with the SOMD software for a dataset of 27 host-guest systems featuring two octa-acids hosts (OA and TEMOA) and a cucurbituril ring (CB8) host. Three different models were used, ModelA computes the free energy of binding based on a double annihilation technique; ModelB additionally takes into account long-range dispersion and standard state corrections; ModelC additionally introduces an empirical correction term derived from a regression analysis of SAMPL5 predictions previously made with SOMD. The performance of each model was evaluated with two different setups; buffer explicitly matches the ionic strength from the binding assays, whereas no-buffer merely neutralizes the host-guest net charge with counter-ions. ModelC/no-buffer shows the lowest mean-unsigned error for the overall dataset (MUE 1.29 < 1.39 < 1.50 kcal mol-1, 95% CI), while explicit modelling of the buffer improves significantly results for the CB8 host only. Correlation with experimental data ranges from excellent for the host TEMOA (R2 0.91 < 0.94 < 0.96), to poor for CB8 (R2 0.04 < 0.12 < 0.23). Further investigations indicate a pronounced dependence of the binding free energies on the modelled ionic strength, and variable reproducibility of the binding free energies between different simulation packages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alchemical free energy; Binding free energy; SAMPL6; SAMPLing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30159717     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0154-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  43 in total

1.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Cucurbit[8]uril mediated donor-acceptor ternary complexes: a model system for studying charge-transfer interactions.

Authors:  Frank Biedermann; Oren A Scherman
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

4.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Scott P Brown; Gregory L Warren; Steven W Muchmore
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  A simple assay for quality binders to cucurbiturils.

Authors:  Julián Vázquez; Patricia Remón; Roy N Dsouza; Alexandra I Lazar; Jesús F Arteaga; Werner M Nau; Uwe Pischel
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Interrogating HIV integrase for compounds that bind--a SAMPL challenge.

Authors:  Thomas S Peat; Olan Dolezal; Janet Newman; David Mobley; John J Deadman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Current and emerging opportunities for molecular simulations in structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Julien Michel
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Blinded predictions of distribution coefficients in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Stefano Bosisio; Antonia S J S Mey; Julien Michel
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  4 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.

Authors:  David R Slochower; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Local Ion Densities can Influence Transition Paths of Molecular Binding.

Authors:  Nicole M Roussey; Alex Dickson
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  Accurate Receptor-Ligand Binding Free Energies from Fast QM Conformational Chemical Space Sampling.

Authors:  Esra Boz; Matthias Stein
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.