Literature DB >> 27468654

Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.

Nonie J Finlayson1, Julie D Golomb2.   

Abstract

A fundamental aspect of human visual perception is the ability to recognize and locate objects in the environment. Importantly, our environment is predominantly three-dimensional (3D), but while there is considerable research exploring the binding of object features and location, it is unknown how depth information interacts with features in the object binding process. A recent paradigm called the spatial congruency bias demonstrated that 2D location is fundamentally bound to object features, such that irrelevant location information biases judgments of object features, but irrelevant feature information does not bias judgments of location or other features. Here, using the spatial congruency bias paradigm, we asked whether depth is processed as another type of location, or more like other features. We initially found that depth cued by binocular disparity biased judgments of object color. However, this result seemed to be driven more by the disparity differences than the depth percept: Depth cued by occlusion and size did not bias color judgments, whereas vertical disparity information (with no depth percept) did bias color judgments. Our results suggest that despite the 3D nature of our visual environment, only 2D location information - not position-in-depth - seems to be automatically bound to object features, with depth information processed more similarly to other features than to 2D location.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D space; Depth perception; Feature binding; Object perception; Object-location binding; Spatial congruency bias

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27468654      PMCID: PMC5035601          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  54 in total

1.  Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception.

Authors:  B T Backus; D J Fleet; A J Parker; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; J Eric T Taylor; Mila Sugovic; John T Wixted
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Lyndsey K Lanagan-Leitzel; Peggy Chen; Rose Halterman; Elisabeth M Fine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-04

Review 5.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Medial temporal lobe activity predicts successful relational memory binding.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

10.  Location dominance in attending to color and shape.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

1.  Both feature comparisons and location comparisons are subject to bias.

Authors:  Ailsa Humphries; Zhe Chen; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Zhuolun Li; Ke Zhang; Quan Lei
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

4.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Binding object features to locations: Does the "spatial congruency bias" update with object movement?

Authors:  Avni N Bapat; Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Exogenous spatial attention shortens perceived depth.

Authors:  Wanyi Guan; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

7.  The influence of spatial location on same-different judgments of facial identity and expression.

Authors:  Maurryce D Starks; Anna Shafer-Skelton; Michela Paradiso; Aleix M Martinez; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.