Literature DB >> 17672424

Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control.

Cathleen M Moore1, Lyndsey K Lanagan-Leitzel, Peggy Chen, Rose Halterman, Elisabeth M Fine.   

Abstract

A wide variety of psychophysical and neurophysiological research suggests that when stimuli are very close together, they cannot be attended separately. As a consequence, they cannot be represented as individual items with specific feature information associated with them. Here we report evidence that the spatial control of attention can be modulated by nonspatial features of the stimuli (such as color and luminance). Observers shifted attention from item to item within highly dense arrays of stimuli. Performance was extremely poor when all of the items in the array were an identical gray. In contrast, performance improved when items differed in color. This finding indicates that nonspatial features, such as color, can facilitate spatial selection and suggests moreover that features can be reliably associated with particular items even when the items are densely clustered.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672424      PMCID: PMC6490965          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  35 in total

Review 1.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

Authors:  J M Findlay; R Walker
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations.

Authors:  D O Bahcall; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; E K Miller; J Duncan; R Desimone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Seeing the forest but not the trees.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds.

Authors:  J R Mounts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

10.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distinguishing blocking from attenuation in visual selective attention.

Authors:  Serap Yigit-Elliott; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-06

3.  Explicit eye movements failed to facilitate the precision of subsequent attentional localization.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Investigating temporal properties of covert shifts of visual attention using the attentional walk task.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

5.  Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Target-flanker similarity effects reflect image segmentation not perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Sihan He; Qingzi Zheng; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.