Literature DB >> 11600661

Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception.

B T Backus1, D J Fleet, A J Parker, D J Heeger.   

Abstract

Stereoscopic depth perception is based on binocular disparities. Although neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) are selective for binocular disparity, their responses do not explicitly code perceived depth. The stereoscopic pathway must therefore include additional processing beyond V1. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine stereo processing in V1 and other areas of visual cortex. We created stereoscopic stimuli that portrayed two planes of dots in depth, placed symmetrically about the plane of fixation, or else asymmetrically with both planes either nearer or farther than fixation. The interplane disparity was varied parametrically to determine the stereoacuity threshold (the smallest detectable disparity) and the upper depth limit (largest detectable disparity). fMRI was then used to quantify cortical activity across the entire range of detectable interplane disparities. Measured cortical activity covaried with psychophysical measures of stereoscopic depth perception. Activity increased as the interplane disparity increased above the stereoacuity threshold and dropped as interplane disparity approached the upper depth limit. From the fMRI data and an assumption that V1 encodes absolute retinal disparity, we predicted that the mean response of V1 neurons should be a bimodal function of disparity. A post hoc analysis of electrophysiological recordings of single neurons in macaques revealed that, although the average firing rate was a bimodal function of disparity (as predicted), the precise shape of the function cannot fully explain the fMRI data. Although there was widespread activity within the extrastriate cortex (consistent with electrophysiological recordings of single neurons), area V3A showed remarkable sensitivity to stereoscopic stimuli, suggesting that neurons in V3A may play a special role in the stereo pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11600661     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.2054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  86 in total

Review 1.  Neural computations underlying depth perception.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET.

Authors:  Angela Deutschländer; Sandra Bense; Thomas Stephan; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Bridging the gap: global disparity processing in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream.

Authors:  Loredana Minini; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Pupillary response induced by stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Fuchuan Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  At what stage of neural processing do perspective depth cues make a difference?

Authors:  Alexandra Séverac Cauquil; Yves Trotter; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.