Literature DB >> 31388836

Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.

Jiehui Qian1, Ke Zhang2.   

Abstract

Most studies on visual working memory (VWM) and spatial working memory (SWM) have employed visual stimuli presented at the fronto-parallel plane and few have involved depth perception. VWM is often considered as a memory buffer for temporarily holding and manipulating visual information that relates to visual features of an object, and SWM for holding and manipulating spatial information that concerns the spatial location of an object. Although previous research has investigated the effect of stereoscopic depth on VWM, the question of how depth positions are stored in working memory has not been systematically investigated, leaving gaps in the existing literature on working memory. Here, we explore working memory for depth by using a change detection task. The memory items were presented at various stereoscopic depth planes perpendicular to the line of sight, with one item per depth plane. Participants were asked to make judgments on whether the depth position of the target (one of the memory items) had changed. The results showed a conservative response bias that observers tended to make 'no change' responses when detecting changes in depth. In addition, we found that similar to VWM, the change detection accuracy degraded with the number of memory items presented, but the accuracy was much lower than that reported for VWM, suggesting that the storage for depth information is severely limited and less precise than that for visual information. The detection sensitivity was higher for the nearest and farthest depths and was better when the probe was presented along with the other items originally in the memory array, indicating that how well the to-be-stored depth can be stored in working memory depends on its relation with the other depth positions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular disparity; Change detection; Depth perception; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31388836     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01640-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  51 in total

1.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.

Authors:  G A Alvarez; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

2.  Finding the common bond: stereoacuity and the other hyperacuities.

Authors:  S P McKee; L Welch; D G Taylor; S F Bowne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Short-term visual memory for location in depth: A U-shaped function of time.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Quan Lei
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Xiaoli Zhang; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Attention restores discrete items to visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Alexandra M Murray; Anna C Nobre; Ian A Clark; André M Cravo; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-22

7.  The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory.

Authors:  Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Shaun P Vecera; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

9.  Evidence for the effect of depth on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Jiaofeng Li; Kaiyue Wang; Shengxi Liu; Quan Lei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evidence for the beneficial effect of perceptual grouping on visual working memory: an empirical study on illusory contour and a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Jiaofeng Li; Jiehui Qian; Fan Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Zhuolun Li; Ke Zhang; Quan Lei
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

2.  The role of ensemble average differs in working memory for depth and planar information.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.004

Review 3.  The Short-Term Retention of Depth.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.