Literature DB >> 33090835

The influence of spatial location on same-different judgments of facial identity and expression.

Maurryce D Starks1, Anna Shafer-Skelton1, Michela Paradiso2, Aleix M Martinez3, Julie D Golomb4.   

Abstract

The "spatial congruency bias" is a behavioral phenomenon where 2 objects presented sequentially are more likely to be judged as being the same object if they are presented in the same location (Golomb, Kupitz, & Thiemann, 2014), suggesting that irrelevant spatial location information may be bound to object representations. Here, we examine whether the spatial congruency bias extends to higher-level object judgments of facial identity and expression. On each trial, 2 real-world faces were sequentially presented in variable screen locations, and subjects were asked to make same-different judgments on the facial expression (Experiments 1-2) or facial identity (Experiment 3) of the stimuli. We observed a robust spatial congruency bias for judgments of facial identity, yet a more fragile one for judgments of facial expression. Subjects were more likely to judge 2 faces as displaying the same expression if they were presented in the same location (compared to in different locations), but only when the faces shared the same identity. On the other hand, a spatial congruency bias was found when subjects made judgments on facial identity, even across faces displaying different facial expressions. These findings suggest a possible difference between the binding of facial identity and facial expression to spatial location. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33090835      PMCID: PMC8641643          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  70 in total

1.  Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: experiments with morphed faces.

Authors:  S R Schweinberger; A M Burton; S W Kelly
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Ifat Levy; Marlene Behrmann; Talma Hendler; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Center-periphery organization of human object areas.

Authors:  I Levy; U Hasson; G Avidan; T Hendler; R Malach
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; J Eric T Taylor; Mila Sugovic; John T Wixted
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Binding identity and orientation in object recognition.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Justin A Harris; Michael C Corballis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression.

Authors:  A W Young; K H McWeeny; D C Hay; A W Ellis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

8.  Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Xiaoli Zhang; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Ralph Adolphs; Stacy Marsella; Aleix M Martinez; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2019-07

10.  Independence of face identity and expression processing: exploring the role of motion.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Natalie Butcher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.