Literature DB >> 30634185

Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Chaipat Chunharas1,2, Rosanne L Rademaker1,3, Thomas C Sprague4, Timothy F Brady1, John T Serences1,5,6.   

Abstract

Visual working memory is the mechanism supporting the continued maintenance of information after sensory inputs are removed. Although the capacity of visual working memory is limited, memoranda that are spaced farther apart on a 2-D display are easier to remember, potentially because neural representations are more distinct within retinotopically organized areas of visual cortex during memory encoding, maintenance, or retrieval. The impact on memory of spatial separability in depth is less clear, even though depth information is essential to guiding interactions with objects in the environment. On one account, separating memoranda in depth may facilitate performance if interference between items is reduced. However, depth information must be inferred indirectly from the 2-D retinal image, and less is known about how visual cortex represents depth. Thus, an alternative possibility is that separation in depth does not attenuate between-items interference; it may even impair performance, as attention must be distributed across a larger volume of 3-D space. We tested these alternatives using a stereo display while participants remembered the colors of stimuli presented either near or far in the 2-D plane or in depth. Increasing separation in-plane and in depth both enhanced performance. Furthermore, participants who were better able to utilize stereo depth cues showed larger benefits when memoranda were separated in depth, particularly for large memory arrays. The observation that spatial separation in the inferred 3-D structure of the environment improves memory performance, as is the case in 2-D environments, suggests that separating memoranda in depth might reduce neural competition by utilizing cortically separable resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30634185      PMCID: PMC6333109          DOI: 10.1167/19.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  77 in total

1.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach.

Authors:  Randall W Engle; Stephen W Tuholski; James E Laughlin; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward Vogel; Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects.

Authors:  K Nakayama; S Shimojo; G H Silverman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Remembering "what" brings along "where" in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Christy Marshuetz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

6.  Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Xiaoli Zhang; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Within-hemifield competition in early visual areas limits the ability to track multiple objects with attention.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Introspective judgments predict the precision and likelihood of successful maintenance of visual working memory.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Caroline H Tredway; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The privileged role of location in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  4 in total

1.  Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Visual Search in 3D: Effects of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Cues to Depth on the Validity of Feature Integration Theory and Perceptual Load Theory.

Authors:  Ciara M Greene; John Broughan; Anthony Hanlon; Seán Keane; Sophia Hanrahan; Stephen Kerr; Brendan Rooney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Visual working memory for connected 3D objects: effects of stimulus complexity, dimensionality and connectivity.

Authors:  Chuanxiuyue He; Peri Gunalp; Hauke S Meyerhoff; Zoe Rathbun; Mike Stieff; Steven L Franconeri; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-19

Review 4.  The Short-Term Retention of Depth.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.