Literature DB >> 31950456

Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.

Jiehui Qian1, Zhuolun Li2, Ke Zhang2, Quan Lei3.   

Abstract

Working memory is considered as a cognitive memory buffer for temporarily holding, processing, and manipulating information. Although working memory for verbal and visual information has been studied extensively in the past literature, few studies have systematically investigated how depth information is stored in working memory. Here, we show that the memory performance for detecting changes in stereoscopic depth is low when there is no change in relative depth order, and the performance is reliably better when depth order is changed. Increasing the magnitude of change only improves memory performance when depth order is kept constant. However, if depth order is changed, the performance remains high, even with a small change magnitude. Our findings suggest that relative depth order is a better indicator for working memory performance than absolute metric depth. The memory representation for individual depth is not independent, but inherently relational, revealing a fundamental organizing principle for depth information in the visual system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Change detection; Depth order; Stereopsis; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31950456     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01705-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  Organization of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Y Jiang; I R Olson; M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception.

Authors:  A A BLANK
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1958-12

3.  Compression of space in visual memory.

Authors:  B R Sheth; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Temporal characteristics of iconic memory.

Authors:  V Di Lollo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Short-term visual memory for location in depth: A U-shaped function of time.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Quan Lei
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Binocular distance perception: egocentric distance tasks.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Xiaoli Zhang; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.

Authors:  Nonie J Finlayson; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Evidence for the effect of depth on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Jiaofeng Li; Kaiyue Wang; Shengxi Liu; Quan Lei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evidence for the beneficial effect of perceptual grouping on visual working memory: an empirical study on illusory contour and a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Jiaofeng Li; Jiehui Qian; Fan Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  The role of ensemble average differs in working memory for depth and planar information.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.004

Review 2.  The Short-Term Retention of Depth.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.