Michelle C Roughton1,2, Paul DiEgidio1,2, Lei Zhou1,2, Karyn Stitzenberg1,2, Anne Marie Meyer1,2. 1. Chapel Hill, N.C. 2. From the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; the Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; and the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The psychosocial benefits of postmastectomy breast reconstruction are well established; however, health care barriers persist. The authors evaluated statewide patient population to further identify obstacles to reconstruction. METHODS: A linked data set combining the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry with administrative claims from Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance plans identified women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2003 to 2006. For inclusion in the study, women must have had a mastectomy within 6 months of diagnosis and had continuous insurance enrollment at least 2 years postoperatively (n = 5381). Multivariable logistic regression was used to model odds of reconstruction. RESULTS: Approximately 20 percent underwent reconstruction (n = 1130). Distance to a plastic surgeon-10 to 20 miles (OR, 0.78) and greater than 20 miles (OR, 0.73; p < 0.05)-was significantly predictive of no reconstruction, independent of other well-known disparities, including age, race, rural location, and lower household income. Women with government-funded health care, such as Medicare (OR, 0.58) and Medicaid (OR, 0.24; p < 0.001), were also significantly less likely to undergo reconstruction. Consistent with previous study, advanced cancer stage and receipt of radiation therapy decreased the likelihood of reconstruction. Furthermore, when the authors compared immediate to delayed reconstruction, rural location, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were significantly predictive of delay. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first population-based study to demonstrate distance to care and insurance plan as significant predictors of receipt of reconstruction. Additional research is needed to understand health care barriers and to determine whether distance to a plastic surgeon can be ameliorated by outreach programs. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
BACKGROUND: The psychosocial benefits of postmastectomy breast reconstruction are well established; however, health care barriers persist. The authors evaluated statewide patient population to further identify obstacles to reconstruction. METHODS: A linked data set combining the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry with administrative claims from Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance plans identified women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2003 to 2006. For inclusion in the study, women must have had a mastectomy within 6 months of diagnosis and had continuous insurance enrollment at least 2 years postoperatively (n = 5381). Multivariable logistic regression was used to model odds of reconstruction. RESULTS: Approximately 20 percent underwent reconstruction (n = 1130). Distance to a plastic surgeon-10 to 20 miles (OR, 0.78) and greater than 20 miles (OR, 0.73; p < 0.05)-was significantly predictive of no reconstruction, independent of other well-known disparities, including age, race, rural location, and lower household income. Women with government-funded health care, such as Medicare (OR, 0.58) and Medicaid (OR, 0.24; p < 0.001), were also significantly less likely to undergo reconstruction. Consistent with previous study, advanced cancer stage and receipt of radiation therapy decreased the likelihood of reconstruction. Furthermore, when the authors compared immediate to delayed reconstruction, rural location, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were significantly predictive of delay. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first population-based study to demonstrate distance to care and insurance plan as significant predictors of receipt of reconstruction. Additional research is needed to understand health care barriers and to determine whether distance to a plastic surgeon can be ameliorated by outreach programs. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
Authors: Caprice K Christian; Joyce Niland; Stephen B Edge; Rebecca A Ottesen; Melissa E Hughes; Richard Theriault; John Wilson; Charles A Hergrueter; Jane C Weeks Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Maria Teresa Nano; Peter Grantley Gill; James Kollias; Melissa Anne Bochner; Peter Malycha; Helen R Winefield Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: E G Wilkins; P S Cederna; J C Lowery; J A Davis; H M Kim; R S Roth; S Goldfarb; P H Izenberg; H P Houin; K W Shaheen Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer Waljee; Mahasin Mujahid; Monica Morrow; Steven J Katz Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Adeyiza O Momoh; Kent A Griffith; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dean Shumway; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Ryan C DeCoster; Megan A Stout; Jack C Burns; Max A Shrout; Margaret Wetzel; Adam J Dugan; Brian D Rinker; Timothy A Butterfield; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Anna E Meade; Samantha M Cummins; Jordyn T Farewell; Sofia Duque; Sydney K Mulqueen; Ashleigh Chuah; Andrew Y Zhang Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-07-05
Authors: Ryan C DeCoster; Robert-Marlo F Bautista; Jack C Burns; Adam J Dugan; R Wesley Edmunds; Brian D Rinker; J Matthew Webster; Henry C Vasconez Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Jessica R Schumacher; Lauren J Taylor; Jennifer L Tucholka; Samuel Poore; Amanda Eggen; Jennifer Steiman; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Chandler S Cortina; Carmen R Bergom; Julie Kijack; Abigail A Thorgerson; Chiang-Ching Spencer Huang; Amanda L Kong Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Parisa Kamali; Joseph A Ricci; Daniel A Curiel; Justin B Cohen; Anmol Chattha; Hinne A Rakhorst; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2018-01-12