Literature DB >> 16432358

A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Caprice K Christian1, Joyce Niland, Stephen B Edge, Rebecca A Ottesen, Melissa E Hughes, Richard Theriault, John Wilson, Charles A Hergrueter, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of postmastectomy reconstruction and investigate the impact of socioeconomic status on the receipt of reconstruction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Outcomes Project is a prospective, multi-institutional database that contains data on all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients treated at one of the participating comprehensive cancer centers.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 2174 patients with DCIS and stage I, II, and III invasive breast cancer who underwent mastectomy at one of 8 NCCN centers. Rates of reconstruction were determined. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether socioeconomic characteristics are associated with breast reconstruction.
RESULTS: Overall, 42% of patients had breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patients with Medicaid and Medicare were less likely to undergo reconstruction than those with managed care insurance; however, there was no difference for indemnity versus managed care insurance. Homemakers and retired patients had fewer reconstructions than those employed outside the home. Patients with a high school education or less were less likely to have reconstruction than those with more education. Race and ethnicity were not significant predictors of reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction rate in this study (42%) is markedly higher than those previously reported. The type of insurance, education level, and employment status of a patient, but not her race or ethnicity, appear to influence the use of breast reconstruction. Because all patients were treated at an NCCN institution, these socioeconomic differences cannot be explained by access to care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432358      PMCID: PMC1448910          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197738.63512.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  40 in total

1.  Improving access needs a whole systems approach. And will be important in averting crises in the millennium winter.

Authors:  A Rogers; J Flowers; D Pencheon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-02

2.  Outcomes assessment in the NCCN: 1998 update. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  J Weeks
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  NCCN outcomes research database: data collection via the Internet.

Authors:  J C Niland
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 4.  Ethnicity/race, ethics, and epidemiology.

Authors:  Arthur L Whaley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction.

Authors:  L L Reaby
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery.

Authors:  C E Desch; L T Penberthy; B E Hillner; M K McDonald; T J Smith; A L Pozez; S M Retchin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  M Morrow; S K Scott; H R Menck; T A Mustoe; D P Winchester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  J H Rowland; K A Desmond; B E Meyerowitz; T R Belin; G E Wyatt; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; N Pal; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  NCCN Internet-based data system for the conduct of outcomes research.

Authors:  J C Niland
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.990

View more
  81 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Lori J Pierce; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Disparities in oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Jane C Weeks; Steven C Stain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Time to diagnosis and breast cancer stage by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Chemotherapy use for hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Melissa E Hughes; Joyce C Niland; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; John Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Selecting high priority quality measures for breast cancer quality improvement.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Melissa E Hughes; Joyce C Niland; Rebecca Ottesen; Stephen B Edge; Michael A Bookman; Robert W Carlson; Richard L Theriault; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Contemporary Geographic Variation and Sociodemographic Correlates of Hysterectomy Rates Among Reproductive-Age Women.

Authors:  Danielle R Gartner; Kemi M Doll; Robert A Hummer; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.