Literature DB >> 12560690

The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors.

Amy K Alderman1, Laurence McMahon, Edwin G Wilkins.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify important sociodemographic factors affecting the utilization of immediate and early delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the United States. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, all cases of mastectomy-treated breast cancer that were reported to a SEER registry in 1998 were identified. Data were limited to reconstructions within the first 4 months postmastectomy, and logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of sociodemographic variables on reconstruction rates. Of the 10,406 mastectomy-treated breast cancer patients, 1607 (15 percent) underwent reconstruction within the first 4 months postmastectomy. Compared with women 45 to 54 years old, those 35 to 44 years old were significantly more likely to have breast reconstruction (OR = 1.52, p < 0.001), but women 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and 75 years and older were significantly less likely to have reconstruction (OR = 0.42, p < 0.001; OR = 0.16, p < 0.001; OR = 0.04, p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with Caucasian women, African American, Hispanic, and Asian women were significantly less likely to have reconstruction (OR = 0.48, p < 0.001; OR = 0.45, p < 0.001; OR = 0.29, p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, a four-fold difference in reconstruction rates existed in high-use versus low-use regions. With regard to the type of reconstruction, patients younger than 35 and 65 to 74 years old were significantly less likely to receive autogenous tissue reconstruction compared with women 45 to 54 years old (OR = 0.47, p = 0.047; OR p = 0.61, p = 0.031, respectively). However, African Americans were significantly more likely to receive autogenous tissue reconstructions compared with Caucasians (OR = 2.03, p = 0.021). According to these data, the utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction in the United States is low and is significantly influenced by patients' age, race, and geographic location. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of provider bias, patient preference, and barriers to care on the utilization of breast reconstruction in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560690     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000041438.50018.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  77 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Breast reconstruction and psychosocial adjustment: what have we learned and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Decline in Racial Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis from 1998 to 2014.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha M Thomas; Whitney O Lane; Jonah P Orr; Ronnie L Shammas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Rachel A Greenup; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Lori J Pierce; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Beth Aviva Preminger; Valerie Lemaine; Isabel Sulimanoff; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Joyce Niland; Stephen B Edge; Rebecca A Ottesen; Melissa E Hughes; Richard Theriault; John Wilson; Charles A Hergrueter; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Association Between Hospital Financial Distress and Immediate Breast Reconstruction Surgery After Mastectomy Among Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Catherine A Richards; Andrew G Rundle; Jason D Wright; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.