Literature DB >> 31513081

Appalachian Status Is a Negative Predictor of Breast Reconstruction Following Breast Cancer Resection.

Ryan C DeCoster, Megan A Stout1, Jack C Burns2, Max A Shrout1, Margaret Wetzel1, Adam J Dugan3, Brian D Rinker4, Timothy A Butterfield5, J Matthew Webster6, Henry C Vasconez2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care disparities in Appalachia are well documented. However, no previous studies have examined possible differences in the utilization of breast reconstruction (BR) in Appalachia. This study aims to determine if a disparity in BR utilization exists in women from Appalachia Kentucky. <br> METHODS: A retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015. The Kentucky Cancer Registry was queried to identify population-level data for female patients diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with mastectomy. A multivariate logistic regression model controlling for patient, disease, and treatment characteristics was constructed to predict the likelihood of BR. <br> RESULTS: Bivariate testing showed differences (P < 0.0001) in BR utilization between Appalachian and non-Appalachian women in Kentucky (15.0% and 26.3%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that women from Appalachia (odds ratio, 0.54; confidence interval (95), 0.48-0.61; P < 0.0001) were less likely to undergo BR than non-Appalachian women. Interestingly, the rate of BR increased over time in both Appalachian (r = 0.115; P < 0.0001) and non-Appalachian women (r = 0.148; P < 0.0001). <br> CONCLUSIONS: Despite the benefits of BR, women from Appalachia undergo BR at lower rates and are less likely to receive BR than non-Appalachian Kentuckians. Although the rates of BR increased over time in both populations, access to comprehensive breast cancer care remains a challenge for women from Kentucky's Appalachian region.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31513081      PMCID: PMC6851444          DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  12 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction. Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns.

Authors:  W S Schain
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum.

Authors:  Warren H Tseng; Thomas R Stevenson; Robert J Canter; Steven L Chen; Vijay P Khatri; Richard J Bold; Steve R Martinez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Habermann; Andrea Abbott; Helen M Parsons; Beth A Virnig; Waddah B Al-Refaie; Todd M Tuttle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S K Al-Ghazal; L Sully; L Fallowfield; R W Blamey
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer Waljee; Monica Morrow; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Racial disparities in the type of postmastectomy reconstruction chosen.

Authors:  Anaeze C Offodile; Thomas C Tsai; Julia B Wenger; Lifei Guo
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  N Patani; H Devalia; A Anderson; K Mokbel
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Dunya Atisha; Amy K Alderman; Julie C Lowery; Latoya E Kuhn; Jenny Davis; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.