Literature DB >> 1387483

A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction.

S S Kroll1, B Baldwin.   

Abstract

In a review of 325 postmastectomy breast reconstructions, the aesthetic quality of the result and the risk of unsuccessful outcome were compared for three techniques: tissue expansion (105 breasts), latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (47 breasts), and TRAM flap (173 breasts). The aesthetic successes achievable with the three methods were similar, and some excellent results were achieved with each of them. The failure rate after tissue expansion (21 percent) was significantly higher than those observed with the TRAM (3 percent) and latissimus (9 percent) flaps. Tissue expansion also was not as aesthetically successful as other techniques in obese patients. For immediate breast reconstruction, the TRAM flap was the most aesthetically successful technique. Although tissue expansion has advantages and may be the best choice for some patients, methods that used autogenous tissue provided more consistent success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1387483     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  28 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction and psychosocial adjustment: what have we learned and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  A Moyer; P Salovey
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-06

3.  Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  G W Carlson; J Bostwick; T M Styblo; B Moore; J T Bried; D R Murray; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: oncology, cosmesis and complications.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-08

Review 5.  Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline.

Authors:  Melissa Shea-Budgell; May Lynn Quan; Blair Mehling; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

6.  Tracking the aesthetic outcomes of prosthetic breast reconstructions that have complications.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Akhil Seth; Jessica Gaido; Neil A Fine; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

7.  Distance to a Plastic Surgeon and Type of Insurance Plan Are Independently Predictive of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle C Roughton; Paul DiEgidio; Lei Zhou; Karyn Stitzenberg; Anne Marie Meyer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Cosmetic outcomes following head and neck melanoma reconstruction: The patient's perspective.

Authors:  Donald Buck; Vinay Rawlani; Jeffrey Wayne; Gregory A Dumanian; Thomas A Mustoe; Neil A Fine; Robert Galiano; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

Review 9.  A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  G E Spyrou; O G Titley; J Cerqueiro; M F Fatah
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  An audit of outcome including patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction performed by breast surgeons.

Authors:  M G Berry; R A al-Mufti; A D Jenkinson; S Denton; M Sullivan; A Vaus; R Carpenter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.