Literature DB >> 33888316

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women aged 70 and older: An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Chandler S Cortina1, Carmen R Bergom2, Julie Kijack3, Abigail A Thorgerson4, Chiang-Ching Spencer Huang5, Amanda L Kong3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer incidence in women aged ≥70 years is steadily increasing, and many are choosing to undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). We aimed to identify factors associated with PMBR, describe reconstruction types, and assess postoperative mortality and re-admission rates in women ≥70 years of age.
METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was examined between 2004 and 2015 for women aged ≥70 years with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy. Statistical analysis was performed by χ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression to select the best models for predicting PMBR and if patients underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) with reconstruction.
RESULTS: A total 73,973 patients met inclusion criteria and 4,552 (6.1%) underwent PMBR, of which 25% had a CPM. 48% had implant reconstruction, 36.2% underwent autologous reconstruction, and 15.1% received combination reconstruction. PMBR was more likely to be performed in patients who were White, had fewer comorbidities, were treated in the Northeast metropolitan areas, and with lower tumor stage (P < .001). CPM was more likely to be performed in patients who were White and treated in community hospitals in rural areas in the South and West. (P < .05). Although 30-day readmission rates were higher in PMBR patients (3.5% vs 2.8%, P < .001), 30 and 90-day mortality rates were lower: 0.03 and 0.2% vs 0.3 and 0.9% (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Although it is understandable that intrinsic tumor characteristics influence the role of PMBR, further research and interventions should be aimed to eliminate the differences that are seen in patient race and geographic location. Readmission and postop mortality rates are overall low and comparable to that of younger patients.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33888316      PMCID: PMC8217182          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   4.348


  26 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes in women ≥70 years undergoing mastectomy with and without reconstruction for breast cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mays; Hanan Alabdulkareem; Paul Christos; Rache Simmons; Tracy-Ann Moo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction for DCIS compared with invasive cancer.

Authors:  Laura Kruper; Xinxin Xu; Katherine Henderson; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  One-stage muscle-sparing breast reconstruction in elderly patients: A new tool for retaining excellent quality of life.

Authors:  Michele Maruccia; Giuseppe Di Taranto; Maria G Onesti
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Regional variation in breast cancer surgery: Results from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Authors:  Alexander S Chiu; Princess Thomas; Brigid K Killelea; Nina Horowitz; Anees B Chagpar; Donald R Lannin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Barbara Salem; Indu Lakhani; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Patterns and outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women - A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D D Oh; K Flitcroft; M E Brennan; A J Spillane
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation.

Authors:  Rachel L Yang; Andrew S Newman; Ines C Lin; Caroline E Reinke; Giorgos C Karakousis; Brian J Czerniecki; Liza C Wu; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Variations in the utilization of immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Apoorve Nayyar; Paula D Strassle; Karishma G Reddy; Danielle I Jameison; Cara G Moses; Michelle C Roughton; Kandace P McGuire; Kristalyn K Gallagher
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: results from a population- based study.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Mahasin S Mujahid; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in elderly patients with breast cancer and no palpable axillary nodes: results after 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Gabriele Martelli; Rosalba Miceli; Maria Grazia Daidone; Gaetano Vetrella; Anna Maria Cerrotta; Domenico Piromalli; Roberto Agresti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Patterns at an Urban Academic Hospital and the Impact of Surgeon Gender.

Authors:  Genevieve Fasano; Solange Bayard; Rulla Tamimi; Anjile An; Michael E Zenilman; Melissa Davis; Lisa Newman; Vivian J Bea
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.