Literature DB >> 31508853

Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.

Ryan C DeCoster1,2, Robert-Marlo F Bautista1,3, Jack C Burns2, Adam J Dugan4, R Wesley Edmunds2, Brian D Rinker5, J Matthew Webster6, Henry C Vasconez3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction (BR) is the reconstructive surgical technique that focuses on restoring normal form and function to the breast following oncologic resection. The goal of this study was to determine if BR disparities exist among rural female patients in Kentucky. <br> METHODS: A retrospective (2006-2015), population-based cohort study was conducted on breast cancer patients (stages I-III) treated with mastectomy with or without BR. We used 2013 Beale codes to stratify patients according to geographic status. Chi-square tests were used to examine the association of BR along the rural-urban continuum. A multivariate logistic regression model controlling for patient, disease, and treatment factors was used to predict BR. The likelihood of BR was reported in odds ratios (OR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI). <br> RESULTS: Overall, 10,032 patients met study criteria. Of those, 2,159 (21.5%) underwent BR. The rate of BR among urban, near-metro, and rural patients was 31.1%, 20.4%, and 13.4%, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that women from near metro (OR 0.54, CI: 0.47-0.61; P < .001) and rural areas (OR 0.36, CI: 0.31-0.41; P < .001) were less likely to undergo BR than women from urban areas. <br> CONCLUSION: Although BR benefits are well documented, women from rural Kentucky undergo BR at lower rates and are less likely to receive BR than their urban counterparts. Efforts should seek to promote equitable access to BR for all patients, including those from rural areas.
© 2019 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast reconstruction; health care disparities; rural health

Year:  2019        PMID: 31508853      PMCID: PMC7064371          DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  29 in total

1.  Impact of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction on Health-Related Quality of Life in Women at High Risk for Breast Carcinoma: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Colleen M McCarthy; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Yun Li; Amy K Alderman; Reshma Jagsi; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Sarah T Hawley; Steven J Katz
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Breast reconstruction after breast cancer.

Authors:  Joseph M Serletti; Joshua Fosnot; Jonas A Nelson; Joseph J Disa; Louis P Bucky
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.

Authors:  E G Wilkins; P S Cederna; J C Lowery; J A Davis; H M Kim; R S Roth; S Goldfarb; P H Izenberg; H P Houin; K W Shaheen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Racial disparities in the type of postmastectomy reconstruction chosen.

Authors:  Anaeze C Offodile; Thomas C Tsai; Julia B Wenger; Lifei Guo
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Distance to a Plastic Surgeon and Type of Insurance Plan Are Independently Predictive of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle C Roughton; Paul DiEgidio; Lei Zhou; Karyn Stitzenberg; Anne Marie Meyer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  G E Spyrou; O G Titley; J Cerqueiro; M F Fatah
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Evaluation of Aesthetic and Quality-of-Life Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Definitive Form-Stable Anatomical Implants.

Authors:  Flavia Kuroda; Cicero Urban; Gustavo Zucca-Matthes; Vilmar Marques de Oliveira; Gabriel Hubner Arana; Marco Iera; Mario Rietjens; Gabriela Santos; Caroline Spagnol; Rubens Silveira de Lima
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Are patients making high-quality decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? [outcomes article].

Authors:  Clara N Lee; Jeff Belkora; Yuchiao Chang; Beverly Moy; Ann Partridge; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The influence of race/ethnicity and place of service on breast reconstruction for Medicare beneficiaries with mastectomy.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Julie Weiss; Karla Kerlikowske; Karen Wernli; Diana Sm Buist; Louise M Henderson; Martha Goodrich; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Beth Virnig; Anna Na Tosteson; Wendy DeMartini; Rebecca Hubbard
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-08
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Breast Cancer Disparities and the Impact of Geography.

Authors:  Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Barnabas Obeng-Gyasi; Willi Tarver
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 2.  Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Long-term Mammography Adherence among Uninsured Women Enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) Program.

Authors:  Rasmi G Nair; Simon J Craddock Lee; Emily Berry; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.090

4.  Safety and efficacy of secondary mandibular reconstruction using a free osteo-cutaneous fibula flap after segmental mandibular resection: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Sho Yamakawa; Kenji Hayashida
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.