Literature DB >> 27423665

Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Antonio Capalbo1,2, Valeria Romanelli3, Danilo Cimadomo4,5, Laura Girardi3, Marta Stoppa4, Lisa Dovere4, Domenico Dell'Edera6, Filippo Maria Ubaldi4,3, Laura Rienzi4,3.   

Abstract

For an IVF clinic that wishes to implement preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases (PGD) and for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A), a global improvement is required through all the steps of an IVF treatment and patient care. At present, CCS (Comprehensive Chromosome Screening)-based trophectoderm (TE) biopsy has been demonstrated as a safe, accurate and reproducible approach to conduct PGD-A and possibly also PGD from the same biopsy. Key challenges in PGD/PGD-A implementation cover genetic and reproductive counselling, selection of the most efficient approach for blastocyst biopsy as well as of the best performing molecular technique to conduct CCS and monogenic disease analysis. Three different approaches for TE biopsy can be compared. However, among them, the application of TE biopsy approaches, entailing the zona opening when the expanded blastocyst stage is reached, represent the only biopsy methods suited with a totally undisturbed embryo culture strategy (time lapse-based incubation in a single media). Moreover, contemporary CCS technologies show a different spectrum of capabilities and limits that potentially impact the clinical outcomes, the management and the applicability of the PGD-A itself. In general, CCS approaches that avoid the use of whole genome amplification (WGA) can provide higher reliability of results with lower costs and turnaround time of analysis. The future perspectives are focused on the scrupulous and rigorous clinical validations of novel CCS methods based on targeted approaches that avoid the use of WGA, such as targeted next-generation sequencing technology, to further improve the throughput of analysis and the overall cost-effectiveness of PGD/PGD-A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCS; Embryo selection; PGD; PGD-A; PGS; Trophectoderm biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423665      PMCID: PMC5065548          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0768-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  43 in total

1.  The effects of different laser pulse lengths on the embryo biopsy procedure and embryo development to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Tyl H Taylor; Janice W Gilchrist; Susan V Hallowell; Kelly K Hanshew; John J Orris; Michael J Glassner; J David Wininger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  William B Schoolcraft; Elpida Fragouli; John Stevens; Santiago Munne; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Aishling Ahlström; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Thorir Hardarson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction.

Authors:  Petra L Wale; David K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single-gene disorders, and/or preimplantation human leukocyte antigen typing, combined with 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing.

Authors:  Svetlana Rechitsky; Tatiana Pakhalchuk; Geraldine San Ramos; Adam Goodman; Zev Zlatopolsky; Anver Kuliev
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective-delivered 1.48-microns diode laser.

Authors:  K Rink; G Delacrétaz; R P Salathé; A Senn; D Nocera; M Germond; P De Grandi; S Fakan
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Anastasia Fedick; Xin Tao; Batsal Devkota; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Maria del Carmen Nogales; Fernando Bronet; Mireia Florensa; Marissa Riqueiros; Lorena Rodrigo; Juan García-Velasco; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS.

Authors:  Alison Campbell; Simon Fishel; Natalie Bowman; Samantha Duffy; Mark Sedler; Simon Thornton
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Laser confers less embryo exposure than acid tyrode for embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles: a randomized study.

Authors:  Selmo Geber; Renata Bossi; Cintia B Lisboa; Marcelo Valle; Marcos Sampaio
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  12 in total

1.  The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool.

Authors:  Randi H Goldman; Catherine Racowsky; Leslie V Farland; Janis H Fox; Santiago Munné; Lia Ribustello; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Excellence in assisted reproductive technologies: clinical and laboratory perspectives.

Authors:  Hakan Yarali; Gurkan Bozdag; Lale Karakoc Sokmensuer; Sezcan Mumusoglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Genetic diagnosis in first or second trimester pregnancy loss using exome sequencing: a systematic review of human essential genes.

Authors:  Sarah M Robbins; Matthew A Thimm; David Valle; Angie C Jelin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients.

Authors:  Amy Kaing; Lindsay L Kroener; Robyn Tassin; Man Li; Lian Liu; Richard Buyalos; Gary Hubert; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Differences in utilization of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) within human services (HHS) regions and metropolitan megaregions in the U.S.

Authors:  Pavel Zagadailov; Albert Hsu; David B Seifer; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Overall Blastocyst Quality, Trophectoderm Grade, and Inner Cell Mass Grade Predict Pregnancy Outcome in Euploid Blastocyst Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Yan-Yu Zhao; Yang Yu; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 7.  Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment.

Authors:  Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Gemma Fabozzi; Roberta Venturella; Roberta Maggiulli; Rossella Mazzilli; Susanna Ferrero; Antonio Palagiano; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Survey on patients' organisations' knowledge and position paper on screening for inherited neuromuscular diseases in Europe.

Authors:  F Lamy; A Ferlini; Teresinha Evangelista
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 9.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in an Iranian family with a novel mutation in MUT gene.

Authors:  Parham Habibzadeh; Zahra Tabatabaei; Mohammad Ali Farazi Fard; Laila Jamali; Aazam Hafizi; Pooneh Nikuei; Leila Salarian; Mohammad Hossein Nasr Esfahani; Zahra Anvar; Mohammad Ali Faghihi
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.