Literature DB >> 23683847

Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS.

Alison Campbell1, Simon Fishel, Natalie Bowman, Samantha Duffy, Mark Sedler, Simon Thornton.   

Abstract

Time-lapse imaging of human preimplantation IVF embryos has enabled objective algorithms based on novel observations of development (morphokinetics) to be used for clinical selection of embryos. Embryo aneuploidy, a major cause of IVF failure, has been correlated with specific morphokinetic variables used previously to develop an aneuploidy risk classification model. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and potential impact of this model for unselected IVF patients without biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). Embryo outcomes - no implantation, fetal heart beat (FHB) and live birth (LB) - of 88 transferred blastocysts were compared according to calculated aneuploidy risk classes (low, medium, high). A significant difference was seen for FHB (P<0.0001) and LB (P<0.01) rates between embryos classified as low and medium risk. Within the low-risk class, relative increases of 74% and 56%, compared with rates for all blastocysts, were observed for FHB and LB respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.75 for FHB and 0.74 for LB. This study demonstrates the clinical relevance of the aneuploidy risk classification model and introduces a novel, non-invasive method of embryo selection to yield higher implantation and live birth rates without PGS.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; aneuploidy; blastocyst; embryology; live birth; time-lapse imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23683847     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  48 in total

1.  Abnormally cleaving embryos are able to produce live births: a time-lapse study.

Authors:  Yan Ling Fan; Shu Biao Han; Li Hong Wu; Ya Ping Wang; Guo Ning Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro.

Authors:  Mariabeatrice Dal Canto; Paola V Novara; Giovanni Coticchio; Mario Mignini Renzini; Fausta Brambillasca; Claudio Brigante; Elena De Ponti; Rubens Fadini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Effect of red light on the development and quality of mammalian embryos.

Authors:  Rong Li; Kamilla Sofie Pedersen; Ying Liu; Hanne Skovsgaard Pedersen; Mette Lægdsmand; Lars Fledelius Rickelt; Michael Kühl; Henrik Callesen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Morphokinetic Evaluation of Embryo Development in a Mouse Model: Functional and Molecular Correlates.

Authors:  Rachel Weinerman; Rui Feng; Teri S Ord; Richard M Schultz; Marisa S Bartolomei; Christos Coutifaris; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.

Authors:  Monika Chawla; Michael Fakih; Amal Shunnar; Asina Bayram; Ali Hellani; Vanamail Perumal; Jayprakash Divakaran; Erdal Budak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A comparison of morphokinetic markers predicting blastocyst formation and implantation potential from two large clinical data sets.

Authors:  N Zaninovic; M Nohales; Q Zhan; Z M J de Los Santos; J Sierra; Z Rosenwaks; M Meseguer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Authors:  Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.