Literature DB >> 30066304

The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool.

Randi H Goldman1, Catherine Racowsky2, Leslie V Farland2, Janis H Fox2, Santiago Munné3,4, Lia Ribustello3, Elizabeth S Ginsburg2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the expected out-of-pocket costs of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to attain a 50%, 75%, or 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst based on individual age and AMH, and develop a personalized counseling tool.
METHODS: A cost analysis was performed and a counseling tool was developed using retrospective data from IVF cycles intended for PGT or blastocyst freeze-all between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2017 (n = 330) and aggregate statistics on euploidy rates of > 149,000 embryos from CooperGenomics. Poisson regression was used to determine the number of biopsiable blastocysts obtained per cycle, based on age and AMH. The expected costs of attaining a 50%, 75%, and 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst were determined via 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations for each age and AMH combination, incorporating age-based euploidy rates and IVF/PGT-A cost assumptions.
RESULTS: The cost to attain a 50% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst ranges from approximately $15,000 U.S. dollars (USD) for younger women with higher AMH values (≥ 2 ng/mL) to > $150,000 for the oldest women (44 years) with the lowest AMH values (< 0.1 ng/mL) in this cohort. The cost to attain a 75% versus 90% likelihood of a euploid blastocyst is similar (~ $16,000) for younger women with higher AMH values, but varies for the oldest women with low AMH values (~ $280,000 and > $450,000, respectively). A typical patient (36-37 years, AMH 2.5 ng/mL) should expect to spend ~ $30,000 for a 90% likelihood of attaining a euploid embryo.
CONCLUSIONS: This tool can serve as a counseling adjunct by providing individualized cost information for patients regarding PGT-A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Cost analysis; Counseling tool; PGT; Preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30066304      PMCID: PMC6133815          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1275-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  33 in total

1.  The utility of embryo banking in order to increase the number of embryos available for preimplantation genetic screening in advanced maternal age patients.

Authors:  John J Orris; Tyl H Taylor; Janice W Gilchrist; Susan V Hallowell; Michael J Glassner; J David Wininger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for 'add-on' interventions?

Authors:  Joyce Harper; Emily Jackson; Karen Sermon; Robert John Aitken; Stephen Harbottle; Edgar Mocanu; Thorir Hardarson; Raj Mathur; Stephane Viville; Andy Vail; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study.

Authors:  Michael Feichtinger; Enrico Vaccari; Luca Carli; Elisabeth Wallner; Ulrike Mädel; Katharina Figl; Simone Palini; Wilfried Feichtinger
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number.

Authors:  Karl R Hansen; George M Hodnett; Nicholas Knowlton; LaTasha B Craig
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elias M Dahdouh; Jacques Balayla; Juan Antonio García-Velasco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  No beneficial effect of preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age with a high risk for embryonic aneuploidy.

Authors:  Moniek Twisk; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; Annemieke Hoek; Maas-Jan Heineman; Fulco van der Veen; Patrick M Bossuyt; Sjoerd Repping; Johanna C Korevaar
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates.

Authors:  E J Forman; X Tao; K M Ferry; D Taylor; N R Treff; R T Scott
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Effect of Embryo Banking on U.S. National Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Birth Rates.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The predictive value of serum concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone for oocyte quality, fertilization, and implantation.

Authors:  Edson Borges; Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda Setti; Rita de Cássia Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Hsing-Hua Lai; Tzu-Hsuan Chuang; Lin-Kin Wong; Meng-Ju Lee; Chia-Lin Hsieh; Huai-Lin Wang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  5 in total

1.  The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Confidential genetic testing and electronic health records: A survey of current practices among Huntington disease testing centers.

Authors:  Celeste C Eno; Stacey K Barton; Naghmeh Dorrani; Stephen D Cederbaum; Joshua L Deignan; Wayne W Grody
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.183

3.  Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M).

Authors:  J Zhang; L R Rubin; H Zierhut; L M Pastore
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Thaw, biopsy and refreeze strategy for PGT-A on previously cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  M Wilding; M Terribile; I Parisi; G Nargund
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-09

5.  The First Live Birth in Lithuania After Application of Preimplantation Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Živilė Gudlevičienė; Raminta Baušytė; Evelina Dagytė; Danutė Balkelienė; Algirdas Utkus; Diana Ramašauskaitė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2020-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.