Literature DB >> 24424365

Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis.

Natalia Basile1, Maria del Carmen Nogales2, Fernando Bronet2, Mireia Florensa3, Marissa Riqueiros3, Lorena Rodrigo4, Juan García-Velasco2, Marcos Meseguer5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the differences in the cleavage time between chromosomally normal and abnormal embryos and to elaborate an algorithm to increase the probability of noninvasively selecting chromosomally normal embryos.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: University-affiliated infertility center. PATIENT(S): Preimplantation genetic screening patients (n = 125; n = 77 with ET), including cases of repeated implantation failure or recurrent miscarriage. A total of 504 embryos were analyzed. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo culture within a time-lapse system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Kinetic variables included the time to 2 (t2), 3 (t3), 4 (t4), and 5 (t5) cells as well as the length of the second (cc2 = t3 - t2) and third (cc3 = t5 - t3) cell cycle, the synchrony in the division from 2 to 4 cells (s2 = t4 - t3), and the interval t5 - t2. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were also analyzed. RESULT(S): A logistic regression analysis identified t5 - t2 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.853; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.763-4.616), followed by cc3 (OR = 2.095; 95% CI, 1.356-3.238) as the most relevant variables related to normal chromosomal content. On the basis of these results, an algorithm for embryo selection is proposed to classify embryos from A to D. Each category exhibited significant differences in the percentage of normal embryos (A, 35.9%; B, 26.4%; C, 12.1%; D, 9.8%). CONCLUSION(S): Chromosomally normal and abnormal embryos have different kinetic behavior. On the basis of these differences, the proposed algorithm serves as a tool to classify embryos and to increase the probability of noninvasively selecting normal embryos.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo kinetics; arrayCGH; chromosome; time lapse

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24424365     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  45 in total

1.  Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.

Authors:  Monika Chawla; Michael Fakih; Amal Shunnar; Asina Bayram; Ali Hellani; Vanamail Perumal; Jayprakash Divakaran; Erdal Budak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics.

Authors:  Beatriz Carrasco; Gemma Arroyo; Yolanda Gil; Mª José Gómez; Ignacio Rodríguez; Pedro N Barri; Anna Veiga; Montserrat Boada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The association between coenzyme Q10 concentrations in follicular fluid with embryo morphokinetics and pregnancy rate in assisted reproductive techniques.

Authors:  Süleyman Akarsu; Funda Gode; Ahmet Zeki Isik; Zeliha Günnur Dikmen; Mustafa Agah Tekindal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  An integrated investigation of oocyte developmental competence: expression of key genes in human cumulus cells, morphokinetics of early divisions, blastulation, and euploidy.

Authors:  C Scarica; D Cimadomo; L Dovere; A Giancani; M Stoppa; A Capalbo; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi; R Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Blastulation of a zygote to a hatched blastocyst without any clear cell division: an observational finding in a time-lapse system after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  N L Sandi-Monroy; S Musanovic; D Zhu; K Eibner; N Reeka; J Koglin; K Bundschu; F Gagsteiger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Oleksii O Barash; Kristen A Ivani; Susan P Willman; Evan M Rosenbluth; Deborah S Wachs; Mary D Hinckley; Sara Pittenger Reid; Louis N Weckstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.