Literature DB >> 19939370

Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.

William B Schoolcraft1, Elpida Fragouli, John Stevens, Santiago Munne, Mandy G Katz-Jaffe, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new strategy for comprehensive chromosome screening at the blastocyst stage.
DESIGN: Clinical research study.
SETTING: An IVF clinic and a specialist preimplantation genetic diagnosis laboratory. PATIENT(S): Forty-five infertile couples participated in the study. The mean maternal age was 37.7 years, and most couples had at least one previous unsuccessful IVF treatment cycle (mean 2.4). INTERVENTION(S): This study used a novel chromosome screening approach, combining biopsy of several trophectoderm cells on day 5 after fertilization and detailed analysis of all 24 types of chromosome using comparative genomic hybridization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proportion of embryos yielding a diagnostic result, aneuploidy rate, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): A diagnosis was obtained from 93.7% of embryos tested. The aneuploidy rate was 51.3%. The probability of an individual transferred embryo forming a pregnancy reaching the third trimester/birth was 68.9%, an implantation rate 50% higher than contemporary cycles from the same clinic. The pregnancy rate was 82.2%. CONCLUSION(S): The comprehensive chromosome screening method described overcomes many of the problems that limited earlier aneuploidy screening techniques and may finally allow preimplantation genetic screening to achieve the benefits predicted by theory. The high embryo implantation rate achieved is particularly encouraging and, if confirmed in subsequent studies, will be of great significance for IVF clinics attempting to reduce the number of embryos transferred or to implement single embryo transfer.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19939370     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  64 in total

1.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?

Authors:  Susan M Maxwell; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  MeiFang Zeng; SuQin Su; LiuMing Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 10.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.