Literature DB >> 26207016

The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction.

Petra L Wale1, David K Gardner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although laboratory procedures, along with culture media formulations, have improved over the past two decades, the issue remains that human IVF is performed in vitro (literally 'in glass').
METHODS: Using PubMed, electronic searches were performed using keywords from a list of chemical and physical factors with no limits placed on time. Examples of keywords include oxygen, ammonium, volatile organics, temperature, pH, oil overlays and incubation volume/embryo density. Available clinical and scientific evidence surrounding physical and chemical factors have been assessed and presented here. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Development of the embryo outside the body means that it is constantly exposed to stresses that it would not experience in vivo. Sources of stress on the human embryo include identified factors such as pH and temperature shifts, exposure to atmospheric (20%) oxygen and the build-up of toxins in the media due to the static nature of culture. However, there are other sources of stress not typically considered, such as the act of pipetting itself, or the release of organic compounds from the very tissue culture ware upon which the embryo develops. Further, when more than one stress is present in the laboratory, there is evidence that negative synergies can result, culminating in significant trauma to the developing embryo. It is evident that embryos are sensitive to both chemical and physical signals within their microenvironment, and that these factors play a significant role in influencing development and events post transfer. From the viewpoint of assisted human reproduction, a major concern with chemical and physical factors lies in their adverse effects on the viability of embryos, and their long-term effects on the fetus, even as a result of a relatively brief exposure. This review presents data on the adverse effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryos and the importance of identifying, and thereby minimizing, them in the practice of human IVF. Hence, optimizing the in vitro environment involves far more than improving culture media formulations.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ammonium; combined stress; density; embryo culture; oxygen; pH; pipetting; temperature

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26207016     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  41 in total

1.  Reformatting the reproductive tract to accommodate the needs of human ARTs.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Applications of omics and nanotechnology to improve pig embryo production in vitro.

Authors:  Caroline G Lucas; Paula R Chen; Fabiana K Seixas; Randall S Prather; Tiago Collares
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Effects of Environmental EDCs on Oocyte Quality, Embryo Development, and the Outcome in Human IVF Process.

Authors:  Xiaoming Xu; Mei Yang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  How to Reduce the Potential Harmful Effects of Light on Blastocyst Development during IVF.

Authors:  József Bódis; Krisztina Gödöny; Ákos Várnagy; Kálmán Kovács; Miklós Koppán; Bernadett Nagy; János Erostyák; Róbert Herczeg; Julia Szekeres-Barthó; Attila Gyenesei; Gabor L Kovács
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 6.  Abnormal Placentation Associated with Infertility as a Marker of Overall Health.

Authors:  Lauren W Sundheimer; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  P66Shc, a key regulator of metabolism and mitochondrial ROS production, is dysregulated by mouse embryo culture.

Authors:  Nicole A Edwards; Andrew J Watson; Dean H Betts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Morphologic and molecular changes in the placenta: what we can learn from environmental exposures.

Authors:  Lisa A Vrooman; Frances Xin; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage of mouse zygotes triggers G2/M checkpoint and phosphorylates Cdc25 and Cdc2.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Diting Qian; Zhiling Li; Yue Huang; Que Wu; Gaizhen Ru; Man Chen; Bin Wang
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.667

10.  Treatment with AICAR inhibits blastocyst development, trophectoderm differentiation and tight junction formation and function in mice.

Authors:  Michele D Calder; Nicole A Edwards; Dean H Betts; Andrew J Watson
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.