Literature DB >> 27351885

Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.

Philipp Mittmann1, I Todt2, A Ernst2, G Rademacher3, S Mutze3, S Göricke4, M Schlamann5, R Ramalingam6, S Lang7, F Christov7, D Arweiler-Harbeck7.   

Abstract

The position of the cochlear electrode array within the scala tympani is essential for an optimal hearing benefit. An intraoperative NRT-ratio was established, which can provide information about the intraoperative intracochlear electrode array position for perimodiolar electrodes. The aims of this study were to verify the longterm reliability for the NRT-ratio in perimodiolar electrodes. In a retrospective controlled study in a Tertiary Referral Center the electrophysiological data sets of 123 patients with implanted Nucleus Contour Advance electrodes were enclosed. Intraoperative and up to 1 year follow-up Auto-NRTs were evaluated. A NRT-ratio was calculated by dividing the average Auto-NRT data from electrode 16 to 18 with the average from electrode 5 to 7. Using a flat panel tomography system, the position of the electrode array was certified radiological. 31 patients with perimodiolar electrodes with 1 year follow-up data were included in the study. Eleven patients showed regular follow-up NRT-ratio with a correlated and radiologically confirmed electrode position. 20 patients showed mismatches between the NRT-ratio and the radiological position. These patients were highly variable in terms of duration of deafness and neural spectrum disorders. The NRT-ratio can be used to determine the intracochlear position of the electrode array for perimodiolar electrodes. Intraoperatively the NRT-ratio predicts the array position within the cochlea highly reliable for perimodiolar electrodes. We showed that after 6 months and a year, the NRT-ratio remains unchanged in most of the cases and shows a good correlation to the radiological determined position of the array. Nevertheless, the condition of the neural structures is highly important for reproducible responses. Limited validity is given in patients with degenerative and structural neural disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; NRT; Quality control; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27351885     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4175-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  41 in total

1.  Electrophysiological Detection of Scalar-Changing Perimodiolar Cochlear Electrode Arrays: A Six-Month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Susan Arndt; Arneborg Ernst; Frederike Hassepass
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Cochlear implant electrode array insertion monitoring with intra-operative 3D rotational X-ray.

Authors:  B Carelsen; W Grolman; R Tange; G J Streekstra; P van Kemenade; R J Jansen; N J M Freling; M White; B Maat; W J Fokkens
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.

Authors:  Yael Henkin; Ricky Kaplan-Neeman; Jona Kronenberg; Lela Migirov; Minka Hildesheimer; Chava Muchnik
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Ototoxicity of ethacrynic acid and aminoglycoside antibiotics in uremia.

Authors:  R H Mathog; W J Klein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; S Hatsushika; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Histologic evaluation of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in the human.

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Arne H Voie; Barry Brunsden; J Gail Neely; Eugene A Saxon; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2007-04

10.  Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen; Ann Yi-Chiun Chuang; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case series.

Authors:  P Mittmann; G Lauer; A Ernst; S Mutze; F Hassepass; S Arndt; D Arweiler-Harbeck; F Christov
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Assessment of cochlear trauma and telemetry measures after cochlear implantation: A comparative study between Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2019-07-11

3.  Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics - a retrospective comparison study.

Authors:  A Perenyi; F Toth; B Dimak; R Nagy; P Schoerg; J Jori; J G Kiss; G Sprinzl; M Csanady; L Rovo
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-09-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.