Literature DB >> 15129102

Histologic evaluation of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in the human.

Joseph B Nadol1, Donald K Eddington.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Histopathologic study of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in patients who had received a cochlear implant during life could provide clues concerning the pathogenesis of meningitis after cochlear implantation.
BACKGROUND: Bacterial meningitis has been reported as an infrequent complication of cochlear implantation using a variety of electrode designs. The cause of meningitis in cochlear implant recipients has not been firmly established. In an analogous surgical situation, namely stapedectomy, delayed meningitis could occur as a complication of ipsilateral acute suppurative otitis media in which there was open communication between the middle ear and perilymph.
METHODS: Twenty-one temporal bones from 20 individuals who had undergone cochlear implantation during life were studied by light microscopy. All sections passing through the cochleostomy site and electrode track were examined to evaluate the tissue seal at the cochleostomy, the presence or absence of an extracochlear electrode sheath, and finally, to seek evidence of a cellular inflammatory response near the electrode. These data were compared with clinical data, including electrode system used, the number of years between implantation and death, type of tissue used at surgery, and the age and sex of the patients.
RESULTS: The 21 specimens included cases implanted with the Symbion Ineraid, Cochlear Corporation Nucleus 22-channel, Cochlear Corporation Nucleus 24-channel, a Cochlear Corporation Nucleus single channel, and Advanced Bionics Clarion C1 devices. At the cochleostomy site, and just within the cochlea, there was a robust fibrous and bony tissue response in all 21 ears and in most cases, there was a fibrous sheath surrounding the electrode in the middle ear. No recognizable open communication or potential communication between the middle ear and the inner ear was seen in any of the 21 ears. An inflammatory cellular response, including mononuclear leukocytes, histiocytes, and foreign body giant cells, were present in 12 of the 21 temporal bones (57%) and was most intense at the cochleostomy site. No statistically significant relationship was found between the presence or absence of inflammatory cells and the type of tissue graft used at surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The histologic evidence presented in this study does not support open communication between the middle and the inner ear as part of the pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis as a late complication after cochlear implantation. Rather, the finding of a cellular inflammatory response in 12 of 21 temporal bones suggests that late hematogenous contamination and colonization of the implant is a much more likely pathogenic mechanism. This putative mechanism has implications for possible strategies to prevent meningitis after cochlear implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129102     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  26 in total

1.  Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  [Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].

Authors:  J Müller; J Helms
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Foreign body or hypersensitivity granuloma of the inner ear after cochlear implantation: one possible cause of a soft failure?

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington; Barbara J Burgess
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  The pattern and degree of capsular fibrous sheaths surrounding cochlear electrode arrays.

Authors:  Reuven Ishai; Barbara S Herrmann; Joseph B Nadol; Alicia M Quesnel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Durability of Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation with Conventional-Length Electrodes and Scala Tympani Insertion.

Authors:  Alex D Sweeney; Jacob B Hunter; Matthew L Carlson; Alejandro Rivas; Marc L Bennett; Rene H Gifford; Jack H Noble; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; I Todt; A Ernst; G Rademacher; S Mutze; S Göricke; M Schlamann; R Ramalingam; S Lang; F Christov; D Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Foreign Body Response to Silicone in Cochlear Implant Electrodes in the Human.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Donald Galler; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.