Literature DB >> 16720441

A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.

Yael Henkin1, Ricky Kaplan-Neeman, Jona Kronenberg, Lela Migirov, Minka Hildesheimer, Chava Muchnik.   

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIVs) in children using the Clarion cochlear implant (CI) programmed with CIS strategy stabilized after 3 months of implant use. The data presented here may be useful as a general guideline for the programming of infants and young children and may further be of help for the identification of patients who fall outside the "average" range.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes in electrical stimulation levels, i.e. threshold (T) levels, comfortable (M) levels, dynamic range (DR), and EIVs during the first 18 months of implant use, in children using the Clarion CI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The maps of 18 pre-lingual children (mean age at implantation 4.2 years; range 1-8), using the Enhanced Bipolar 1.2 or Bipolar standard electrode with the S-Series speech processor programmed with CIS strategy, were examined at five time points: connection, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-initial stimulation. T levels, M levels, DR and EIVs were analyzed according to four cochlear segments: apical, apical-medial, medial-basal, and basal.
RESULTS: During the first 3 months of implant use T levels increased to some extent, whereas M levels and DR increased significantly. From 3 months and through the entire follow-up, T and M levels as well as DR were stable. EIVs of current carrying electrodes decreased significantly from connection to the 3-month visit; thereafter a stabilization of values was evident. Electrical stimulation levels and EIVs did not differ among the cochlear segments during the entire follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720441     DOI: 10.1080/00016480500443391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  10 in total

1.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A longitudinal study of speech perception skills and device characteristics of adolescent cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Robinson; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Christine M Brenner; Ann E Geers
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; I Todt; A Ernst; G Rademacher; S Mutze; S Göricke; M Schlamann; R Ramalingam; S Lang; F Christov; D Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Christine P Etlert; Sara O'Brient; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of a Parylene Thin-Film Electrode Array for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yuchen Xu; Chuan Luo; Fan-Gang Zeng; John C Middlebrooks; Harrison W Lin; Zheng You
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Sanna Hou; Patricia Van Buynder; Christopher Flynn; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen; Ann Yi-Chiun Chuang; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art.

Authors:  Bart Vaerenberg; Cas Smits; Geert De Ceulaer; Elie Zir; Sally Harman; N Jaspers; Y Tam; Margaret Dillon; Thomas Wesarg; D Martin-Bonniot; L Gärtner; Sebastian Cozma; Julie Kosaner; Sandra Prentiss; P Sasidharan; Jeroen J Briaire; Jane Bradley; J Debruyne; R Hollow; Rajesh Patadia; Lucas Mens; K Veekmans; R Greisiger; E Harboun-Cohen; Stéphanie Borel; Dayse Tavora-Vieira; Patrizia Mancini; Helen Cullington; Amy Han-Chi Ng; Adam Walkowiak; William H Shapiro; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-04

9.  Temporal changes in impedance of implanted adults for various cochlear segments.

Authors:  C A Leone; F Mosca; R Grassia
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Exploiting Routine Clinical Measures to Inform Strategies for Better Hearing Performance in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Alan P Sanderson; Edward T F Rogers; Carl A Verschuur; Tracey A Newman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.