Ulrich Lohbauer1, Sven Reich2. 1. Research Laboratory for Dental Biomaterials, Dental Clinic 1, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. ulrich.lohbauer@fau.de. 2. Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Centre of Implantology, Universitätsklinik Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of wear on the antagonist occlusal surfaces of clinically placed monolithic zirconia premolar and molar crowns (LAVA Plus, 3M ESPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen in situ monolithic zirconia crowns and their opposing antagonists (n = 26) are the subject of an ongoing clinical trial and have been clinically examined at baseline and after 24 months. Silicone impressions were taken and epoxy replicas produced for qualitative SEM analysis and quantitative analysis using optical profilometry. Based on the baseline replicas, the follow-up situation has been scanned and digitally matched with the initial topography in order to calculate the mean volume loss (in mm3) as well as the mean maximum vertical loss (in mm) after 2 years in service. RESULTS: The mean volume loss for enamel antagonist contacts (n = 7) was measured to 0.361 mm3 and the mean of the maximum vertical loss to 0.204 mm. The mean volume loss for pure ceramic contacts (n = 10) was measured to 0.333 mm3 and the mean of the maximum vertical loss to 0.145 mm. The wear rates on enamel contacts were not significantly different from those measured on ceramic antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limitations of this study, it can be concluded for the monolithic zirconia material LAVA Plus that the measured wear rates are in consensus with other in vivo studies on ceramic restorations. Further, that no significant difference was found between natural enamel antagonists and ceramic restorations as antagonists. The monolithic zirconia restorations do not seem to be affected by wear within the first 2 years. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The monolithic zirconia crowns (LAVA Plus) show acceptable antagonist wear rates after 2 years in situ, regardless of natural enamel or ceramics as antagonist materials.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of wear on the antagonist occlusal surfaces of clinically placed monolithic zirconia premolar and molar crowns (LAVA Plus, 3M ESPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen in situ monolithic zirconia crowns and their opposing antagonists (n = 26) are the subject of an ongoing clinical trial and have been clinically examined at baseline and after 24 months. Silicone impressions were taken and epoxy replicas produced for qualitative SEM analysis and quantitative analysis using optical profilometry. Based on the baseline replicas, the follow-up situation has been scanned and digitally matched with the initial topography in order to calculate the mean volume loss (in mm3) as well as the mean maximum vertical loss (in mm) after 2 years in service. RESULTS: The mean volume loss for enamel antagonist contacts (n = 7) was measured to 0.361 mm3 and the mean of the maximum vertical loss to 0.204 mm. The mean volume loss for pure ceramic contacts (n = 10) was measured to 0.333 mm3 and the mean of the maximum vertical loss to 0.145 mm. The wear rates on enamel contacts were not significantly different from those measured on ceramic antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limitations of this study, it can be concluded for the monolithic zirconia material LAVA Plus that the measured wear rates are in consensus with other in vivo studies on ceramic restorations. Further, that no significant difference was found between natural enamel antagonists and ceramic restorations as antagonists. The monolithic zirconia restorations do not seem to be affected by wear within the first 2 years. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The monolithic zirconia crowns (LAVA Plus) show acceptable antagonist wear rates after 2 years in situ, regardless of natural enamel or ceramics as antagonist materials.
Authors: Paul Lambrechts; Elke Debels; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Marleen Peumans; Bart Van Meerbeek Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Verena Preis; Michael Behr; Gerhard Handel; Sibylle Schneider-Feyrer; Sebastian Hahnel; Martin Rosentritt Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2012-03-14
Authors: Marina R Kaizer; Petra C Gierthmuehlen; Mateus Bf Dos Santos; Sergio S Cava; Yu Zhang Journal: Ceram Int Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 4.527