Literature DB >> 30827797

The progressive wear and abrasiveness of novel graded glass/zirconia materials relative to their dental ceramic counterparts.

Marina R Kaizer1, Rafael R Moraes2, Sergio S Cava3, Yu Zhang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the wear behavior of novel graded glass/zirconia materials and their abrasiveness to the antagonist relative to homogeneous zirconias (polished or glazed) and a glass-ceramic.
METHODS: Graded glass/zirconia specimens were prepared by sintering with concurrent glass-infiltration of pre-sintered zirconia (3Y-TZP) with a polished or as-machined surface. Monolithic zirconia samples were sintered and their surfaces were polished or glazed (as-machined). Glass-ceramic samples were obtained and the surface polished. All specimens were subjected to chewing simulations with a steatite antagonist (r = 3 mm) and a cyclic load of 50 N. Quantitative measurements of wear and roughness were performed on ceramics and antagonists for prescribed number of cycles. Damage sustained in ceramics and antagonists was analyzed by SEM.
RESULTS: The polished zirconia presented little to no variation in wear depth (2 μm) and roughness (0.06 μm). Graded and glazed zirconia experienced a rapid increase in wear depth while the superficial glass layer was present (until 1000 cycles), but showed little variations afterwards - at 450k cycles ∼15 μm for graded and 78 μm for glazed zirconia. The glass-ceramic presented the greatest wear depth (463 μm) and roughness (1.48 μm). Polished zirconia, polished graded zirconia and glazed zirconia yielded significantly lower volumetric wear (∼3 mm3) of the antagonist than as-machined graded zirconia and glass-ceramic (∼5 mm3). SIGNIFICANCE: Polished graded zirconia and polished zirconia presented little wear and roughness, as well as yielded reduced antagonist wear. Glassy materials are both more susceptible to wear and more abrasive to the antagonist relative to zirconia.
Copyright © 2019 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glass-ceramic; Glass-infiltration; Graded zirconia; Sliding wear; Steatite; Volume loss; Y-TZP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30827797      PMCID: PMC6462421          DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  62 in total

1.  Development of a clinically validated bulk failure test for ceramic crowns.

Authors:  J Robert Kelly; Patchnee Rungruanganunt; Ben Hunter; Francesca Vailati
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Fractographic ceramic failure analysis using the replica technique.

Authors:  Susanne S Scherrer; Janet B Quinn; George D Quinn; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.

Authors:  S D Heintze; A Cavalleri; M Forjanic; G Zellweger; V Rousson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Sliding contact fatigue of graded zirconia with external esthetic glass.

Authors:  L Ren; M N Janal; Y Zhang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Mutlu Özcan; Felix Schmutz; Albert Trottmann; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Effect of polishing instruments and polishing regimens on surface topography and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia: An evaluation with XPS and XRD analysis.

Authors:  Nadin Al-Haj Husain; Josette Camilleri; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: A dental laboratory survey.

Authors:  Taiseer A Sulaiman; Aous A Abdulmajeed; Terence E Donovan; Lyndon F Cooper; Ricardo Walter
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 8.  Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Al-Amleh; K Lyons; M Swain
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Hedayat Moradpoor; Omid Savabi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations.

Authors:  C S Jones; R W Billington; G J Pearson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Eleana Kontonasaki; Athanasios E Rigos; Charithea Ilia; Thomas Istantsos
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-02

Review 2.  Revolution of Current Dental Zirconia: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi; Omar Ghulam; Majid Krsoum; Suhail Binmahmoud; Hasan Taher; Wael Elmalky; Muhammad Sohail Zafar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Overview of Several Typical Ceramic Materials for Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Hao Yu Shi; Runxuan Pang; Jing Yang; Di Fan; HongXin Cai; Heng Bo Jiang; Jianmin Han; Eui-Seok Lee; Yunhan Sun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.