Literature DB >> 17122161

Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays.

N Krämer1, K-H Kunzelmann, M Taschner, A Mehl, F Garcia-Godoy, R Frankenberger.   

Abstract

Wear phenomena of ceramic inlays are not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate ceramic wear, antagonist enamel wear, and luting cement wear over 8 years. The two-fold null hypothesis was that there would be (1) no difference in wear behavior between ceramic and enamel, and (2) no influence of filler content of luting composites on composite wear. From 96 restorations, 36 Class II inlays from 16 participants were selected. For inlays with opposing enamel cusps (n=17), replicas of inlays and enamel were scanned with a 3-D laser scanner. Luting gaps of inlays (n=36) were analyzed with a profilometer, including 3-D data analysis. Ceramic and enamel wear increased between 4 and 8 years, with significantly higher values for enamel after 6 years (p<0.05). Luting gap wear increased continuously up to 8 years (p<0.05), with no influence of luting composites (p>0.05) and location of teeth (p>0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122161     DOI: 10.1177/154405910608501206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  13 in total

1.  Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Andreas Ender; Albert Trottmann; Mutlu Özcan; Jens Fischer; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; M Voet; J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; A Van Ende; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Twenty-nine-month follow-up of a paediatric zirconia dental crown.

Authors:  Serena Lopez Cazaux; Isabelle Hyon; Tony Prud'homme; Sylvie Dajean Trutaud
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years.

Authors:  Ulrich Lohbauer; Sven Reich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Three years in vivo wear: core-ceramic, veneers, and enamel antagonists.

Authors:  Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw; William F Rose; Allyson A Barrett; Erica R Oliveira; Mark C K Yang; Arthur E Clark; Kenneth J Anusavice
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  The effect of different pretreatment methods of PMMA-based crowns on the long-term tensile bond strength to dentin abutments.

Authors:  Christine Keul; Daliah Kohen; Marlis Eichberger; Malgorzata Roos; Wolfgang Gernet; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Andreas Krawczuk; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Wear of ceramic-based dental materials.

Authors:  Oscar Borrero-Lopez; Fernando Guiberteau; Yu Zhang; Brian R Lawn
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-01-12

9.  In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of different esthetic restorations.

Authors:  Amal Abdelsamad Sakrana
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements.

Authors:  Arao Nobuaki; Yoshida Keiichi; Sawase Takashi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.