Literature DB >> 27260267

Complication avoidance with pre-operative screening: insights from the Seattle spine team.

Quinlan D Buchlak1, Vijay Yanamadala1, Jean-Christophe Leveque1, Rajiv Sethi2,3.   

Abstract

Complication rates for complex adult lumbar scoliosis surgery are unacceptably high. Standardized preoperative evaluation protocols have been shown to significantly reduce the likelihood of a spectrum of negative outcomes associated with complex adult lumbar scoliosis surgery. To increase patient safety and reduce complication risk, an entire medical and surgical team should work together to care for adult lumbar scoliosis patients. This article describes preoperative patient evaluation strategies with a particular focus on adult lumbar scoliosis surgery involving six or more levels of spinal fusion. Domains considered include recent preoperative evaluation literature, predictive risk modeling, the appropriate management of medical conditions, and the composition and activities of a multidisciplinary conference review team. An evidence-based comprehensive systematic preoperative surgical evaluation process is described.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult lumbar scoliosis; Multidisciplinary patient care; Risk mitigation; Risk stratification; Spine surgery; Surgical risk management

Year:  2016        PMID: 27260267      PMCID: PMC4958383          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9351-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  51 in total

Review 1.  An evidence-based approach to spine surgery.

Authors:  R Todd Allen; Jeffrey A Rihn; Steven D Glassman; Bradford Currier; Todd J Albert; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  The Risk of Getting Worse: Predictors of Deterioration After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Ulf S Nerland; Asgeir S Jakola; Charalampis Giannadakis; Ole Solheim; Clemens Weber; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Cases With Single Versus Two Attending Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Jeffrey J Barry; Sassan Keshavarzi; Ozgur Dede; Michael H Weber; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2013-01-03

4.  Prediction of massive blood loss in scoliosis surgery from preoperative variables.

Authors:  Xuerong Yu; Han Xiao; Ruiying Wang; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Standardizing care for high-risk patients in spine surgery: the Northwestern high-risk spine protocol.

Authors:  Ryan J Halpin; Patrick A Sugrue; Robert W Gould; Peter G Kallas; Michael F Schafer; Stephen L Ondra; Tyler R Koski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2005-2010.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Atman Desai; Samuel F Bakhoum; Symeon Missios
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Intraoperative blood loss during different stages of scoliosis surgery: A prospective study.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung-Woo Suh; Jae-Young Hong; Sang-Heon Song; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-08-07

8.  Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Amy M Cizik; Deven Hamilton; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Does obesity affect the surgical outcome and complication rates of spinal surgery? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Jiang; Yuanjun Teng; Zhenzhen Fan; Shahidur Khan; Yayi Xia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  The Relationship between Preoperative Expectations and the Short-Term Postoperative Satisfaction and Functional Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Ellis; Scott S Mallozzi; Jacob E Mathews; Isaac L Moss; Jean A Ouellet; Peter Jarzem; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-05-06
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mesenchymal stromal cells in spinal fusion: Current and future applications.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Cynthia J Susai; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-25

2.  How Do Spinal Surgeons Perceive The Impact of Factors Used in Post-Surgical Complication Risk Scores?

Authors:  Enea Parimbelli; Wilk Szymon; Dympna O'Sullivan; Stephen Kingwell; Wojtek Michalowski; Martin Michalowski
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

3.  Natural Language Processing Applications in the Clinical Neurosciences: A Machine Learning Augmented Systematic Review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Nazanin Esmaili; Christine Bennett; Farrokh Farrokhi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 5.  Classification of Adult Spinal Deformity: Review of Current Concepts and Future Directions.

Authors:  Laxmikant Dagdia; Terufumi Kokabu; Manabu Ito
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-05-29

6.  Timing of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Affects Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes.

Authors:  Abiram Bala; Deepak V Chona; Derek F Amanatullah; Serena S Hu; Kirkham B Wood; Todd F Alamin; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-11-04

7.  Variations in LOS and its main determinants overtime at an academic spinal care center from 2006-2019.

Authors:  Dandurand Charlotte; N Hindi Mathew; Ailon Tamir; Boyd Michael; Charest-Morin Raphaële; Dea Nicolas; Dvorak Marcel; Fisher Charles; K Kwon Brian; Paquette Scott; Street John
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life at 12-month follow-up in patients undergoing anterior endoscopic skull base surgery.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Nazanin Esmaili; Christine Bennett; Yi Yuen Wang; James King; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.