Literature DB >> 24211097

A predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2005-2010.

Kimon Bekelis1, Atman Desai2, Samuel F Bakhoum3, Symeon Missios4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is increasing scrutiny by several regulatory bodies regarding the complications of spine surgery. Precise delineation of the risks contributing to those complications remains a topic of debate.
PURPOSE: We attempted to create a predictive model of complications in patients undergoing spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 13,660 patients registered in the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, death, infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and return to the operating room.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent spine surgery between 2005 and 2010 and were registered in NSQIP. A model for outcome prediction based on individual patient characteristics was developed.
RESULTS: Of the 13,660 patients, 2,719 underwent anterior approaches (19.9%), 565 corpectomies (4.1%), and 1,757 fusions (12.9%). The respective 30-day postoperative risks were 0.05% for stroke, 0.2% for MI, 0.25% for death, 0.3% for infection, 1.37% for UTI, 0.6% for DVT, 0.29% for PE, and 3.15% for return to the operating room. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increasing age, more extensive operations (fusion, corpectomy), medical deconditioning (weight loss, dialysis, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes), increasing body mass index, non-independent mobilization (preoperative neurologic deficit), and bleeding disorders were independently associated with a more than 3 days' length of stay. A validated model for outcome prediction based on individual patient characteristics was developed. The accuracy of the model was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which was 0.95, 0.82, 0.87, 0.75, 0.74, 0.78, 0.76, 0.74, and 0.65 for postoperative risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, death, infection, DVT, PE, UTI, length of stay of 3 days or longer, and return to the operating room, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model can provide individualized estimates of the risks of postoperative complications based on preoperative conditions, and can potentially be used as an adjunct in decision-making for spine surgery.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior approach; Cervical spondylosis; Corpectomy; Lumbar spondylosis; NSQIP; Posterior approach; Risk prediction; Spinal fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24211097     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  42 in total

1.  Development of a machine learning algorithm predicting discharge placement after surgery for spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Paul T Ogink; Aditya V Karhade; Quirina C B S Thio; Stuart H Hershman; Thomas D Cha; Christopher M Bono; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Primary Endovascular Repair of Ilio-Caval Injury Encountered during Anterior Exposure Spine Surgery: Evolution of the Paradigm.

Authors:  Patrick C Bonasso; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Alexandre d'Audiffret; Lakshmikumar Pillai
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  Comments to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9) and the reply to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9).

Authors:  Kimberley L Edwards
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Results of Database Studies in Spine Surgery Can Be Influenced by Missing Data.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Ryan P McLynn; Michael P Fice; Andre M Samuel; Adam M Lukasiewicz; Daniel D Bohl; Junyoung Ahn; Kern Singh; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; T De Silva; A Uneri; J Goerres; M Jacobson; M Ketcha; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J-P Wolinsky; J L Prince; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator.

Authors:  Maximilian F Kasparek; Friedrich Boettner; Anna Rienmueller; Michael Weber; Philipp T Funovics; Petra Krepler; Reinhard Windhager; Josef Grohs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Complication avoidance with pre-operative screening: insights from the Seattle spine team.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Vijay Yanamadala; Jean-Christophe Leveque; Rajiv Sethi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 8.  Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Anastasia Tasiou; Theofanis Giannis; Alexandros G Brotis; Ioannis Siasios; Iordanis Georgiadis; Haralampos Gatos; Eleni Tsianaka; Konstantinos Vagkopoulos; Konstantinos Paterakis; Kostas N Fountas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

9.  Postoperative Complications Following Orthopedic Spine Surgery: Is There a Difference Between Men and Women?

Authors:  Jessica H Heyer; N A Cao; Richard L Amdur; Raj R Rao
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

10.  National outcomes following single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jamal Shillingford; Joseph Laratta; Nathan Hardy; Comron Saifi; Joseph Lombardi; Andrew J Pugely; Ronald A Lehman; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.