Literature DB >> 27927323

Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Cases With Single Versus Two Attending Surgeons.

Christopher P Ames1, Jeffrey J Barry2, Sassan Keshavarzi3, Ozgur Dede2, Michael H Weber2, Vedat Deviren2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the perioperative morbidity of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) based on the presence of 1 versus 2 attending surgeons. BACKGROUND
SUMMARY: Pedicle subtraction osteotomies are challenging cases with high complication rates and substantial physiological burden on patients. The literature supports the benefits of 2-surgeon strategies in complex cases in other specialties.
METHODS: We reviewed a single institution database of all pedicle subtraction osteotomies (78 cases) from 2005-2010 and divided the cohort into single versus 2-surgeon groups (42 vs. 36 cases, respectively). We performed subset analysis after excluding cases before 2007 and excluding patients with staged anterior and posterior procedures. We analyzed cases for estimated blood loss, length of surgery, length of stay, radiographic analysis, rate of return to the operating room within 30 days, and medical and neurological complications.
RESULTS: The groups were similar when comparing mean number of posterior levels fused, levels decompressed and revision rates, however, the average age of the single surgeon and 2 surgeon groups was 57.6 and 64.3 years, respectively (p = .02). The 2 groups had comparable correction of radiographic parameters. Mean percent estimated blood loss for single versus 2 surgeons was 109% versus 35% (p < .001) and estimated blood loss was 5,278 versus 2,003 mL (p < .001). Average surgical time for single versus 2 surgeons was 7.6 versus 5.0 hours (p < .001). A total of 45% of single-surgeon patients compared with 25% of 2-surgeon patients experienced at least 1 major complication within 30 days. In the single-surgeon group, 19% had unplanned surgery within 30 days, versus 8% in the 2-surgeon group.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2 surgeons at an experienced spine deformity center decreases the operative time and estimated blood loss, and may be a key factor in witnessed decreased major complication prevalence. This approach also may decrease the rate of premature case termination and return to operating room in 30 days.
Copyright © 2013 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood loss; Multiple surgeons; Pedicle subtraction osteotomy; Perioperative outcomes; Spinal deformity

Year:  2013        PMID: 27927323     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  13 in total

1.  PSO without neuromonitoring: analysis of peri-op complication rate after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adults.

Authors:  Per D Trobisch; Steven W Hwang; Steffen Drange
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Single vs two attending senior surgeons: assessment of intra-operative blood loss at different surgical stages of posterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Constantine Tarabanis; Eric Schneider; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

Review 5.  Complication avoidance with pre-operative screening: insights from the Seattle spine team.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Vijay Yanamadala; Jean-Christophe Leveque; Rajiv Sethi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

6.  Hypercomplex pedicle subtraction osteotomies: definition, early clinical and radiological results and complications.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Andrea Zanirato; Domenico Compagnone; Andrea Redaelli; Marco Damilano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Pseudarthrosis and construct failure after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy : Influence of biomechanics, surgical technique, biology and avoidance strategies].

Authors:  C Birkenmaier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Letter to the Editor: Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Dominick A Tuason; Harold G Moore; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Factors Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Porous Nitinol Implant.

Authors:  Fahad H Abduljabbar; Asim M Makhdom; Mona Rajeh; Alisson R Tales; Jacob Mathew; Jean Ouellet; Michael Weber; Peter Jarzem
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  TWO CONSULTANT SPINAL OPERATING: OPERATOR PERCEIVED BENEFITS.

Authors:  Jonathan Macdonald; Stacey Thomson; Niall Eames; Greg McLorinan; Eugene Verzin; Nagy Darwish
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2017-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.