Literature DB >> 22872215

Prediction of massive blood loss in scoliosis surgery from preoperative variables.

Xuerong Yu1, Han Xiao, Ruiying Wang, Yuguang Huang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of massive blood loss after scoliosis surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Scoliosis surgery may be associated with considerable blood loss. Many blood conservation techniques have been used to reduce the allogeneic transfusion. An ability to identify patients with high risk of massive blood loss preoperatively may be helpful for appropriate use of these techniques.
METHODS: Data of patients undergoing scoliosis surgery between June 1, 2011, and October 31, 2011, were collected. Preoperative information and total blood loss, which was calculated as the sum of intraoperative and postoperative estimated blood loss, were recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups, retrospectively: group A (n = 95) with the total blood loss more than 30% of estimated blood volume and group B (n = 64) with the total blood loss of 30% of estimated blood volume or less. Preoperative data were compared between the groups. Significant variables were selected for a forward stepwise binary logistic regression analysis to determine the independent risk factors of massive blood loss.
RESULTS: More than half of the patients (59.7%) undergoing scoliosis surgery had massive blood loss. Patients in group A were shorter (P = 0.01) and had larger preoperative Cobb angle (P < 0.01), more levels fused (P < 0.01), and more osteotomies (P < 0.01) than those in group B. Preoperative Cobb angle more than 50º (P = 0.017, odds ratio = 2.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-5.20), the number of fused levels more than 6 (P = 0.014, odds ratio = 3.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-10.49), and osteotomy (P = 0.000, odds ratio = 4.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.97-10.94) were determined to be the independent risk factors of massive blood loss in scoliosis surgery.
CONCLUSION: Risk of massive blood loss (total blood loss > 30% of estimated blood volume) in patients with scoliosis could increase, if they (1) had preoperative Cobb angle larger than 50º or (2) planned to undergo osteotomy or fusion of more than 6 levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22872215     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826c63cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Influence of curve magnitude and other variables on operative time, blood loss and transfusion requirements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Nugent; R C Tarrant; J M Queally; P Sheeran; D P Moore; P J Kiely
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  The use of three rods in correcting severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Brett Rocos; Eliane Rioux-Trottier; Masayoshi Machida; Amit Sigal; Jim Kennedy; David E Lebel; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 3.  The efficacy of bipolar sealer on blood loss in spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Lan; Shi-Yu Hu; Xin-Jian Yang; Yang Chen; Yi-Yan Qiu; Wei-Zhuang Guo; Jian-Ze Lin; Kai Ren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Single vs two attending senior surgeons: assessment of intra-operative blood loss at different surgical stages of posterior spinal fusion surgery in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does intraoperative cell salvage system effectively decrease the need for allogeneic transfusions in scoliotic patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jinqian Liang; Jianxiong Shen; Sooyong Chua; Yu Fan; Jiliang Zhai; Bin Feng; Siyi Cai; Zheng Li; Xuhong Xue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Reduced blood loss and operation time in lumbar posterolateral fusion using a bipolar sealer.

Authors:  Daisuke Fukui; Mamoru Kawakami; Shin-Ichi Nakao; Erabu Miyamoto; Shouko Morishita; Toshiko Matuoka; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  One-step (standard) versus two-step surgical approach in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior spinal fusion: Which is better?

Authors:  Norman Ramirez; Pablo Valentin; Manuel García-Cartagena; Solais Samalot; Ivan Iriarte
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-13

8.  Predicting lowest hemoglobin level and risk of blood transfusion in spinal fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Hany Abdel Gawwad Soliman; Marie Beausejour; Julie Joncas; Marjolaine Roy-Beaudry; Soraya Barchi; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Guy Grimard; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Perioperative blood conservation strategies for pediatric scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Mark J McVey; W Lau; N Naraine; C Zaarour; R Zeller
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-04-26

10.  Gender of patients and level of osteotomy are predictive factors for blood loss in ankylosing spondylitis patients undergoing pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Yanjun Liu; Zhengliang Ma; Xiaoping Gu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.