Literature DB >> 24239799

Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.

Michael J Lee1, Amy M Cizik2, Deven Hamilton2, Jens R Chapman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The possibility and likelihood of a postoperative medical complication after spine surgery undoubtedly play a major role in the decision making of the surgeon and patient alike. Although prior study has determined relative risk and odds ratio values to quantify risk factors, these values may be difficult to translate to the patient during counseling of surgical options. Ideally, a model that predicts absolute risk of medical complication, rather than relative risk or odds ratio values, would greatly enhance the discussion of safety of spine surgery. To date, there is no risk stratification model that specifically predicts the risk of medical complication.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to create and validate a predictive model for the risk of medical complication during and after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Statistical analysis using a prospective surgical spine registry that recorded extensive demographic, surgical, and complication data. Outcomes examined are medical complications that were specifically defined a priori. This analysis is a continuation of statistical analysis of our previously published report.
METHODS: Using a prospectively collected surgical registry of more than 1,476 patients with extensive demographic, comorbidity, surgical, and complication detail recorded for 2 years after surgery, we previously identified several risk factor for medical complications. Using the beta coefficients from those log binomial regression analyses, we created a model to predict the occurrence of medical complication after spine surgery. We split our data into two subsets for internal and cross-validation of our model. We created two predictive models: one predicting the occurrence of any medical complication and the other predicting the occurrence of a major medical complication.
RESULTS: The final predictive model for any medical complications had a receiver operator curve characteristic of 0.76, considered to be a fair measure. The final predictive model for any major medical complications had receiver operator curve characteristic of 0.81, considered to be a good measure. The final model has been uploaded for use on SpineSage.com.
CONCLUSION: We present a validated model for predicting medical complications after spine surgery. The value in this model is that it gives the user an absolute percent likelihood of complication after spine surgery based on the patient's comorbidity profile and invasiveness of surgery. Patients are far more likely to understand an absolute percentage, rather than relative risk and confidence interval values. A model such as this is of paramount importance in counseling patients and enhancing the safety of spine surgery. In addition, a tool such as this can be of great use particularly as health care trends toward pay-for-performance, quality metrics, and risk adjustment. To facilitate the use of this model, we have created a website (SpineSage.com) where users can enter in patient data to determine likelihood of medical complications after spine surgery.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; Medical complications; Multivariate analysis; Predictive model; Spine surgery; Spinesage.com

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239799      PMCID: PMC4012388          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation in a large coronary artery bypass grafting cohort.

Authors:  Emma Thorén; Laila Hellgren; Lena Jidéus; Elisabeth Ståhle
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-07

3.  Development of an index to characterize the "invasiveness" of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Mark A Konodi; Lorri A Lee; Judith A Turner; Robert Goodkin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Risk factors for medical complication after cervical spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 582 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Mark A Konodi; Amy M Cizik; Mark A Weinreich; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Risk factors for medical complication after spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 1,591 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Mark A Konodi; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Geoff A Baker; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens R Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Risk factors for medical complication after lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 767 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Jacques Hacquebord; Anuj Varshney; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens Chapman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Amy M Cizik; Michael J Lee; Brook I Martin; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Systematic review: prediction of perioperative cardiac complications and mortality by the revised cardiac risk index.

Authors:  Meredith K Ford; W Scott Beattie; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; Lorri A Lee; Robert Goodkin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total
  21 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: What are the Risk Factors for Cerebrovascular Accidents After Elective Orthopaedic Surgery?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Development of a model to predict the probability of incurring a complication during spine surgery.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Ulrike Held; Tim Pigott; Andrea Luca; Markus Loibl; Raluca Reitmeir; Tamás Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comments to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9) and the reply to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9).

Authors:  Kimberley L Edwards
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Predictive modeling of complications.

Authors:  Joseph A Osorio; Justin K Scheer; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

6.  Validation of a surgical invasiveness index in patients with lumbar spinal disorders registered in the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Erik M Holzer; Emin Aghayev; Dave O'Riordan; Tamas F Fekete; Dezső J Jeszenszky; Daniel Haschtmann; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstueck; Tim Pigott; Everard Munting; Andrea Luca; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  How Do Spinal Surgeons Perceive The Impact of Factors Used in Post-Surgical Complication Risk Scores?

Authors:  Enea Parimbelli; Wilk Szymon; Dympna O'Sullivan; Stephen Kingwell; Wojtek Michalowski; Martin Michalowski
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator.

Authors:  Maximilian F Kasparek; Friedrich Boettner; Anna Rienmueller; Michael Weber; Philipp T Funovics; Petra Krepler; Reinhard Windhager; Josef Grohs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Setting the equation: establishing value in spine care.

Authors:  Daniel K Resnick; Anna N A Tosteson; Rachel F Groman; Zoher Ghogawala
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Surgical site infection following elective orthopaedic surgeries in geriatric patients: Incidence and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Zhiquan Liang; Kai Rong; Wenfei Gu; Xin Yu; Rui Fang; Yingjie Deng; Laijin Lu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.