Michael J Lee1, Amy M Cizik2, Deven Hamilton2, Jens R Chapman2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: Jihoon2000@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The possibility and likelihood of a postoperative medical complication after spine surgery undoubtedly play a major role in the decision making of the surgeon and patient alike. Although prior study has determined relative risk and odds ratio values to quantify risk factors, these values may be difficult to translate to the patient during counseling of surgical options. Ideally, a model that predicts absolute risk of medical complication, rather than relative risk or odds ratio values, would greatly enhance the discussion of safety of spine surgery. To date, there is no risk stratification model that specifically predicts the risk of medical complication. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to create and validate a predictive model for the risk of medical complication during and after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: Statistical analysis using a prospective surgical spine registry that recorded extensive demographic, surgical, and complication data. Outcomes examined are medical complications that were specifically defined a priori. This analysis is a continuation of statistical analysis of our previously published report. METHODS: Using a prospectively collected surgical registry of more than 1,476 patients with extensive demographic, comorbidity, surgical, and complication detail recorded for 2 years after surgery, we previously identified several risk factor for medical complications. Using the beta coefficients from those log binomial regression analyses, we created a model to predict the occurrence of medical complication after spine surgery. We split our data into two subsets for internal and cross-validation of our model. We created two predictive models: one predicting the occurrence of any medical complication and the other predicting the occurrence of a major medical complication. RESULTS: The final predictive model for any medical complications had a receiver operator curve characteristic of 0.76, considered to be a fair measure. The final predictive model for any major medical complications had receiver operator curve characteristic of 0.81, considered to be a good measure. The final model has been uploaded for use on SpineSage.com. CONCLUSION: We present a validated model for predicting medical complications after spine surgery. The value in this model is that it gives the user an absolute percent likelihood of complication after spine surgery based on the patient's comorbidity profile and invasiveness of surgery. Patients are far more likely to understand an absolute percentage, rather than relative risk and confidence interval values. A model such as this is of paramount importance in counseling patients and enhancing the safety of spine surgery. In addition, a tool such as this can be of great use particularly as health care trends toward pay-for-performance, quality metrics, and risk adjustment. To facilitate the use of this model, we have created a website (SpineSage.com) where users can enter in patient data to determine likelihood of medical complications after spine surgery.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The possibility and likelihood of a postoperative medical complication after spine surgery undoubtedly play a major role in the decision making of the surgeon and patient alike. Although prior study has determined relative risk and odds ratio values to quantify risk factors, these values may be difficult to translate to the patient during counseling of surgical options. Ideally, a model that predicts absolute risk of medical complication, rather than relative risk or odds ratio values, would greatly enhance the discussion of safety of spine surgery. To date, there is no risk stratification model that specifically predicts the risk of medical complication. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to create and validate a predictive model for the risk of medical complication during and after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: Statistical analysis using a prospective surgical spine registry that recorded extensive demographic, surgical, and complication data. Outcomes examined are medical complications that were specifically defined a priori. This analysis is a continuation of statistical analysis of our previously published report. METHODS: Using a prospectively collected surgical registry of more than 1,476 patients with extensive demographic, comorbidity, surgical, and complication detail recorded for 2 years after surgery, we previously identified several risk factor for medical complications. Using the beta coefficients from those log binomial regression analyses, we created a model to predict the occurrence of medical complication after spine surgery. We split our data into two subsets for internal and cross-validation of our model. We created two predictive models: one predicting the occurrence of any medical complication and the other predicting the occurrence of a major medical complication. RESULTS: The final predictive model for any medical complications had a receiver operator curve characteristic of 0.76, considered to be a fair measure. The final predictive model for any major medical complications had receiver operator curve characteristic of 0.81, considered to be a good measure. The final model has been uploaded for use on SpineSage.com. CONCLUSION: We present a validated model for predicting medical complications after spine surgery. The value in this model is that it gives the user an absolute percent likelihood of complication after spine surgery based on the patient's comorbidity profile and invasiveness of surgery. Patients are far more likely to understand an absolute percentage, rather than relative risk and confidence interval values. A model such as this is of paramount importance in counseling patients and enhancing the safety of spine surgery. In addition, a tool such as this can be of great use particularly as health care trends toward pay-for-performance, quality metrics, and risk adjustment. To facilitate the use of this model, we have created a website (SpineSage.com) where users can enter in patient data to determine likelihood of medical complications after spine surgery.
Authors: T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-09-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Mark A Konodi; Lorri A Lee; Judith A Turner; Robert Goodkin Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael J Lee; Mark A Konodi; Amy M Cizik; Mark A Weinreich; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael J Lee; Mark A Konodi; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman Journal: Spine J Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Geoff A Baker; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens R Chapman; Michael J Lee Journal: Spine J Date: 2012-02-18 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Michael J Lee; Jacques Hacquebord; Anuj Varshney; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens Chapman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Amy M Cizik; Michael J Lee; Brook I Martin; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Sohail K Mirza Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; Lorri A Lee; Robert Goodkin Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Pascal Zehnder; Ulrike Held; Tim Pigott; Andrea Luca; Markus Loibl; Raluca Reitmeir; Tamás Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Anne F Mannion Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Erik M Holzer; Emin Aghayev; Dave O'Riordan; Tamas F Fekete; Dezső J Jeszenszky; Daniel Haschtmann; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstueck; Tim Pigott; Everard Munting; Andrea Luca; Anne F Mannion Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Maximilian F Kasparek; Friedrich Boettner; Anna Rienmueller; Michael Weber; Philipp T Funovics; Petra Krepler; Reinhard Windhager; Josef Grohs Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 3.134