Literature DB >> 21102298

Standardizing care for high-risk patients in spine surgery: the Northwestern high-risk spine protocol.

Ryan J Halpin1, Patrick A Sugrue, Robert W Gould, Peter G Kallas, Michael F Schafer, Stephen L Ondra, Tyler R Koski.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review article of current literature on the preoperative evaluation and postoperative management of patients undergoing high-risk spine operations and a presentation of a multidisciplinary protocol for patients undergoing high-risk spine operation.
OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based outline of modifiable risk factors and give an example of a multidisciplinary protocol with the goal of improving outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Protocol-based care has been shown to improve outcomes in many areas of medicine. A protocol to evaluate patients undergoing high-risk procedures may ultimately improve patient outcomes.
METHODS: The English language literature to date was reviewed on modifiable risk factors for spine surgery. A multidisciplinary team including hospitalists, critical care physicians, anesthesiologists, and spine surgeons from neurosurgery and orthopedics established an institutional protocol to provide comprehensive care in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods for patients undergoing high-risk spine operations.
RESULTS: An example of a comprehensive pre-, peri-, and postoperative high-risk spine protocol is provided, with focus on the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing high-risk spine operations and modifiable risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Standardizing preoperative risk assessment may lead to better outcomes after major spine operations. A high-risk spine protocol may help patients by having dedicated physicians in multiple specialties focusing on all aspects of a patients care in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21102298     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e8abb0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  Complication avoidance with pre-operative screening: insights from the Seattle spine team.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Vijay Yanamadala; Jean-Christophe Leveque; Rajiv Sethi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 2.  Neurological complications in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Justin A Iorio; Patrick Reid; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Spine centers of excellence: applications for the ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Sravisht Iyer
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

4.  Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc.

Authors:  Karin Büttner-Janz; Richard D Guyer; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

5.  Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Carlo Santaguida; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

6.  Spine Instrumented Surgery on a Budget-Tools for Lowering Cost Without Changing Outcome.

Authors:  Ilyas Eli; Robert G Whitmore; Zoher Ghogawala
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04

7.  Variations in LOS and its main determinants overtime at an academic spinal care center from 2006-2019.

Authors:  Dandurand Charlotte; N Hindi Mathew; Ailon Tamir; Boyd Michael; Charest-Morin Raphaële; Dea Nicolas; Dvorak Marcel; Fisher Charles; K Kwon Brian; Paquette Scott; Street John
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.721

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.