Literature DB >> 27147351

Hi-Res scan mode in clinical MDCT systems: Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.

Juan P Cruz-Bastida1, Daniel Gomez-Cardona1, Ke Li2, Heyi Sun3, Jiang Hsieh4, Timothy P Szczykutowicz2, Guang-Hong Chen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The introduction of a High-Resolution (Hi-Res) scan mode and another associated option that combines Hi-Res mode with the so-called High Definition (HD) reconstruction kernels (referred to as a Hi-Res/HD mode in this paper) in some multi-detector CT (MDCT) systems offers new opportunities to increase spatial resolution for some clinical applications that demand high spatial resolution. The purpose of this work was to quantify the in-plane spatial resolution along both the radial direction and tangential direction for the Hi-Res and Hi-Res/HD scan modes at different off-center positions.
METHODS: A technique was introduced and validated to address the signal saturation problem encountered in the attempt to quantify spatial resolution for the Hi-Res and Hi-Res/HD scan modes. Using the proposed method, the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of a 64-slice MDCT system (Discovery CT750 HD, GE Healthcare) equipped with both Hi-Res and Hi-Res/HD modes were measured using a metal bead at nine different off-centered positions (0-16 cm with a step size of 2 cm); at each position, both conventional scans and Hi-Res scans were performed. For each type of scan and position, 80 repeated acquisitions were performed to reduce noise induced uncertainties in the MTF measurements. A total of 15 reconstruction kernels, including eight conventional kernels and seven HD kernels, were used to reconstruct CT images of the bead. An ex vivo animal study consisting of a bone fracture model was performed to corroborate the MTF results, as the detection of this high-contrast and high frequency task is predominantly determined by spatial resolution. Images of this animal model generated by different scan modes and reconstruction kernels were qualitatively compared with the MTF results.
RESULTS: At the centered position, the use of Hi-Res mode resulted in a slight improvement in the MTF; each HD kernel generated higher spatial resolution than its counterpart conventional kernel. However, the MTF along the tangential direction of the scan field of view (SFOV) was significantly degraded at off-centered positions, yet the combined Hi-Res/HD mode reduced this azimuthal MTF degradation. Images of the animal bone fracture model confirmed the improved spatial resolution at the off-centered positions through the use of the Hi-Res mode and HD kernels.
CONCLUSIONS: The Hi-Res/HD scan improve spatial resolution of MDCT systems at both centered and off-centered positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147351      PMCID: PMC4841803          DOI: 10.1118/1.4946816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Samuel Richard; Daniela B Husarik; Girijesh Yadava; Simon N Murphy; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.

Authors:  Ke Li; John Garrett; Yongshuai Ge; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging.

Authors:  John A Carrino; Abdullah Al Muhit; Wojciech Zbijewski; Gaurav K Thawait; J Webster Stayman; Nathan Packard; Robert Senn; Dong Yang; David H Foos; John Yorkston; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; P De Jean; P Prakash; Y Ding; J W Stayman; N Packard; R Senn; D Yang; J Yorkston; A Machado; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.

Authors:  M A Habibzadeh; M R Ay; A R Kamali Asl; H Ghadiri; H Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Extremity cone-beam CT for evaluation of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: Initial experience in imaging of the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee.

Authors:  Gaurav K Thawait; Shadpour Demehri; Abdullah AlMuhit; Wojciech Zbijweski; John Yorkston; Filippo Del Grande; Bashir Zikria; John A Carrino; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise.

Authors:  Thomas Toth; Zhanyu Ge; Michael P Daly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Modified ideal observer model (MIOM) for high-contrast and high-spatial resolution CT imaging tasks.

Authors:  Juan P Cruz-Bastida; Daniel Gomez-Cardona; John Garrett; Timothy Szczykutowicz; Guang-Hong Chen; Ke Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Four-dimensional computed tomography of the left ventricle, Part II: Estimation of mechanical activation times.

Authors:  Ashish Manohar; Jed D Pack; Andrew J Schluchter; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Regional left ventricular endocardial strains estimated from low-dose 4DCT: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.

Authors:  Ashish Manohar; Gabrielle M Colvert; Juan E Ortuño; Zhennong Chen; James Yang; Brendan T Colvert; W Patricia Bandettini; Marcus Y Chen; María J Ledesma-Carbayo; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.506

4.  Low-dose cone-beam CT via raw counts domain low-signal correction schemes: Performance assessment and task-based parameter optimization (Part II. Task-based parameter optimization).

Authors:  Daniel Gomez-Cardona; John W Hayes; Ran Zhang; Ke Li; Juan Pablo Cruz-Bastida; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Role of Computed Tomography Scan in Dental Trauma: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Feng Li; Jun Li; Deming Zhang; Feng Wu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics Analysis of Cervical Cancer for Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Space Invasion.

Authors:  Gang Huang; Yaqiong Cui; Ping Wang; Jialiang Ren; Lili Wang; Yaqiong Ma; Yingmei Jia; Xiaomei Ma; Lianping Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner.

Authors:  Luuk J Oostveen; Kirsten L Boedeker; Monique Brink; Mathias Prokop; Frank de Lange; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.