Literature DB >> 35192200

Four-dimensional computed tomography of the left ventricle, Part II: Estimation of mechanical activation times.

Ashish Manohar1, Jed D Pack2, Andrew J Schluchter3, Elliot R McVeigh3,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We demonstrate the viability of a four-dimensional X-ray computed tomography (4DCT) imaging system to accurately and precisely estimate mechanical activation times of left ventricular (LV) wall motion. Accurate and reproducible timing estimates of LV wall motion may be beneficial in the successful planning and management of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
METHODS: We developed an anthropomorphically accurate in silico LV phantom based on human CT images with programmed septal-lateral wall dyssynchrony. Twenty-six temporal phases of the in silico phantom were used to sample the cardiac cycle of 1 s. For each of the 26 phases, 1 cm thick axial slabs emulating axial CT image volumes were extracted, 3D printed, and imaged using a commercially available CT scanner. A continuous dynamic sinogram was synthesized by blending sinograms from these static phases; the synthesized sinogram emulated the sinogram that would be acquired under true continuous phantom motion. Using the synthesized dynamic sinogram, images were reconstructed at 70 ms intervals spanning the full cardiac cycle; these images exhibited expected motion artifact characteristics seen in images reconstructed from real dynamic data. The motion corrupted images were then processed with a novel motion correction algorithm (ResyncCT) to yield motion corrected images. Five pairs of motion uncorrected and motion corrected images were generated, each corresponding to a different starting gantry angle (0 to 180 degrees in 45 degree increments). Two line profiles perpendicular to the endocardial surface were used to sample local myocardial motion trajectories at the septum and the lateral wall. The mechanical activation time of wall motion was defined as the time at which the endocardial boundary crossed a fixed position defined on either of the two line profiles while moving toward the center of the LV during systolic contraction. The mechanical activation times of these myocardial trajectories estimated from the motion uncorrected and the motion corrected images were then compared with those derived from the static images of the 3D printed phantoms (ground truth). The precision of the timing estimates was obtained from the five different starting gantry angle simulations.
RESULTS: The range of estimated mechanical activation times observed across all starting gantry angles was significantly larger for the motion uncorrected images than for the motion corrected images (lateral wall: 58 ± 15 ms vs 12 ± 4 ms, p < 0.005; septal wall: 61 ± 13 ms vs 13 ± 9 ms, p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: 4DCT images processed with the ResyncCT motion correction algorithm yield estimates of mechanical activation times of LV wall motion with significantly improved accuracy and precision. The promising results reported in this study highlight the potential utility of 4DCT in estimating the timing of mechanical events of interest for CRT guidance.
© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac CT; cardiac mechanical activation time; cardiac resynchronization therapy; dyssynchronous left ventricular phantom; motion correction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35192200      PMCID: PMC9007845          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  NCRP report 160 and what it means for medical imaging and nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Norman E Bolus
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-10-31

2.  Utility of dual-source computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy-DIRECT study.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Jackie Szymonifka; Michael H Picard; Wai-Ee Thai; Bryan Wai; Jim W Cheung; E Kevin Heist; Udo Hoffmann; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Cardiac dyssynchrony analysis using circumferential versus longitudinal strain: implications for assessing cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  Robert H Helm; Christophe Leclercq; Owen P Faris; Cengizhan Ozturk; Elliot McVeigh; Albert C Lardo; David A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Programming Strategies.

Authors:  Xu Gao; Mohamad Abdi; Daniel A Auger; Changyu Sun; Christopher A Hanson; Austin A Robinson; Christopher Schumann; Pim J Oomen; Sarah Ratcliffe; Rohit Malhotra; Andrew Darby; Oliver J Monfredi; J Michael Mangrum; Pamela Mason; Sula Mazimba; Jeffrey W Holmes; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein; Michael Salerno; Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-08-18

5.  Quantitative analysis of intraventricular dyssynchrony using wall thickness by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Jagmeet P Singh; Christopher P Cannon; Ammar Sarwar; Khurram Nasir; Angelo Auricchio; Francesco F Faletra; Antonio Sorgente; Cristina Conca; Tiziano Moccetti; Mark Handschumacher; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11

6.  Timing of cardiac contraction in humans mapped by high-temporal-resolution MRI tagging: early onset and late peak of shortening in lateral wall.

Authors:  J J M Zwanenburg; M J W Götte; J P A Kuijer; R M Heethaar; A C van Rossum; J T Marcus
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Victoria Delgado; Claudia Ypenburg; Rutger J van Bommel; Laurens F Tops; Sjoerd A Mollema; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Gabe B Bleeker; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Association of intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex.

Authors:  Rutger J van Bommel; Hidekazu Tanaka; Victoria Delgado; Matteo Bertini; Carel Jan Willem Borleffs; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Johannes Holzmeister; Frank Ruschitzka; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Comprehensive use of cardiac computed tomography to guide left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Ronak Rajani; Amir Pourmorteza; Rebecca Preston; Orod Razeghi; Steve Niederer; Shaumik Adhya; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Gerry Carr-White; Reza Razavi; Elliot McVeigh; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  2 in total

1.  Regional left ventricular endocardial strains estimated from low-dose 4DCT: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.

Authors:  Ashish Manohar; Gabrielle M Colvert; Juan E Ortuño; Zhennong Chen; James Yang; Brendan T Colvert; W Patricia Bandettini; Marcus Y Chen; María J Ledesma-Carbayo; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Using a Lead Placement Score Derived From 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Ashish Manohar; Gabrielle M Colvert; James Yang; Zhennong Chen; Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo; Mads Brix Kronborg; Anders Sommer; Bjarne L Nørgaard; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 8.589

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.