Literature DB >> 35751864

Regional left ventricular endocardial strains estimated from low-dose 4DCT: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.

Ashish Manohar1, Gabrielle M Colvert2, Juan E Ortuño3,4, Zhennong Chen2, James Yang2, Brendan T Colvert2, W Patricia Bandettini5, Marcus Y Chen5, María J Ledesma-Carbayo3,4, Elliot R McVeigh2,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estimates of regional left ventricular (LV) strains provide additional information to global function parameters such as ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) and are more sensitive in detecting abnormal regional cardiac function. The accurate and reproducible assessment of regional cardiac function has implications in the management of various cardiac diseases such as heart failure, myocardial ischemia, and dyssynchrony.
PURPOSE: To develop a method that yields highly reproducible, high-resolution estimates of regional endocardial strains from 4DCT images.
METHODS: A method for estimating regional LV endocardial circumferential ( ε c c ) $( {{\epsilon }_{cc}} )$ and longitudinal ( ε l l ${\epsilon }_{ll}$ ) strains from 4DCT was developed. Point clouds representing the LV endocardial surface were extracted for each time frame of the cardiac cycle from 4DCT images. 3D deformation fields across the cardiac cycle were obtained by registering the end diastolic point cloud to each subsequent point cloud in time across the cardiac cycle using a 3D point-set registration technique. From these deformation fields, ε c c and ε l l ${\epsilon }_{cc}\ {\rm{and\ }}{\epsilon }_{ll}$ were estimated over the entire LV endocardial surface by fitting an affine transformation with maximum likelihood estimation. The 4DCT-derived strains were compared with strains estimated in the same subjects by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); twenty-four subjects had CMR scans followed by 4DCT scans acquired within a few hours. Regional LV circumferential and longitudinal strains were estimated from the CMR images using a commercially available feature tracking software (cvi42). Global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were calculated as the mean of the regional strains across the entire LV for both modalities. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses were used for comparisons. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the 4DCT-derived strains.
RESULTS: The 4DCT-derived regional strains correlated well with the CMR-derived regional strains ( ε c c ${\epsilon }_{cc}$ : r = 0.76, p < 0.001; ε l l ${\epsilon }_{ll}$ : r = 0.64, p < 0.001). A very strong correlation was found between 4DCT-derived GCS and 4DCT-derived EF (r = -0.96; p < 0.001). The 4DCT-derived strains were also highly reproducible, with very low inter- and intraobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficients in the range of [0.92, 0.99]).
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel method to estimate high-resolution regional LV endocardial circumferential and longitudinal strains from 4DCT images. Except for the definition of the mitral valve and LV outflow tract planes, the method is completely user independent, thus yielding highly reproducible estimates of endocardial strain. The 4DCT-derived strains correlated well with those estimated using a commercial CMR feature tracking software. The promising results reported in this study highlight the potential utility of 4DCT in the precise assessment of regional cardiac function for the management of cardiac disease.
© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4DCT; LV function; LV myocardial strain; cardiac CT

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35751864      PMCID: PMC9474637          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.506


  51 in total

1.  NCRP report 160 and what it means for medical imaging and nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Norman E Bolus
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-10-31

2.  Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI).

Authors:  Thomas J Stocker; Simon Deseive; Jonathon Leipsic; Martin Hadamitzky; Marcus Y Chen; Ronen Rubinshtein; Mathias Heckner; Jeroen J Bax; Xiang-Ming Fang; Erik Lerkevang Grove; John Lesser; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; James Otton; Sanghoon Shin; Gianluca Pontone; Hugo Marques; Benjamin Chow; Cesar H Nomura; Ramzi Tabbalat; Axel Schmermund; Joon-Won Kang; Christopher Naoum; Melany Atkins; Eugenio Martuscelli; Steffen Massberg; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Strain analysis from 4-D cardiac CT image data.

Authors:  Yechiel Lamash; Anath Fischer; Shemy Carasso; Jonathan Lessick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  A new method for cardiac computed tomography regional function assessment: stretch quantifier for endocardial engraved zones (SQUEEZ).

Authors:  Amir Pourmorteza; Karl H Schuleri; Daniel A Herzka; Albert C Lardo; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Global 2-dimensional strain as a new prognosticator in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Goo-Yeong Cho; Thomas H Marwick; Hyun-Sook Kim; Min-Kyu Kim; Kyung-Soon Hong; Dong-Jin Oh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  M-SiSSR: Regional Endocardial Function Using Multilabel Simultaneous Subdivision Surface Registration.

Authors:  Davis M Vigneault; Francisco Contijoch; Christopher P Bridge; Katherine Lowe; Chelsea Jan; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Funct Imaging Model Heart       Date:  2021-06-18

7.  Circumferential Strain Predicts Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following an Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Kenneth Mangion; David Carrick; Jaclyn Carberry; Ahmed Mahrous; Christie McComb; Keith G Oldroyd; Hany Eteiba; Mitchell Lindsay; Margaret McEntegart; Stuart Hood; Mark C Petrie; Stuart Watkins; Andrew Davie; Xiaodong Zhong; Frederick H Epstein; Caroline E Haig; Colin Berry
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A novel method for evaluating regional RV function in the adult congenital heart with low-dose CT and SQUEEZ processing.

Authors:  Francisco J Contijoch; Daniel W Groves; Zhennong Chen; Marcus Y Chen; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Comparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain software packages by their abilities to discriminate outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; David Mui; Julio A Chirinos; Payman Zamani; Victor A Ferrari; Yucheng Chen; Yuchi Han
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Reference ranges for three-dimensional feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: comparison with two-dimensional methodology and relevance of age and gender.

Authors:  Boyang Liu; Ahmed M Dardeer; William E Moody; Manvir K Hayer; Shanat Baig; Anna M Price; Francisco Leyva; Nicola C Edwards; Richard P Steeds
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.