Ashish Manohar1, Gabrielle M Colvert2, Juan E Ortuño3,4, Zhennong Chen2, James Yang2, Brendan T Colvert2, W Patricia Bandettini5, Marcus Y Chen5, María J Ledesma-Carbayo3,4, Elliot R McVeigh2,6,7. 1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 3. Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain. 4. Biomedical Image Technologies Laboratory, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Estimates of regional left ventricular (LV) strains provide additional information to global function parameters such as ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) and are more sensitive in detecting abnormal regional cardiac function. The accurate and reproducible assessment of regional cardiac function has implications in the management of various cardiac diseases such as heart failure, myocardial ischemia, and dyssynchrony. PURPOSE: To develop a method that yields highly reproducible, high-resolution estimates of regional endocardial strains from 4DCT images. METHODS: A method for estimating regional LV endocardial circumferential ( ε c c ) $( {{\epsilon }_{cc}} )$ and longitudinal ( ε l l ${\epsilon }_{ll}$ ) strains from 4DCT was developed. Point clouds representing the LV endocardial surface were extracted for each time frame of the cardiac cycle from 4DCT images. 3D deformation fields across the cardiac cycle were obtained by registering the end diastolic point cloud to each subsequent point cloud in time across the cardiac cycle using a 3D point-set registration technique. From these deformation fields, ε c c and ε l l ${\epsilon }_{cc}\ {\rm{and\ }}{\epsilon }_{ll}$ were estimated over the entire LV endocardial surface by fitting an affine transformation with maximum likelihood estimation. The 4DCT-derived strains were compared with strains estimated in the same subjects by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); twenty-four subjects had CMR scans followed by 4DCT scans acquired within a few hours. Regional LV circumferential and longitudinal strains were estimated from the CMR images using a commercially available feature tracking software (cvi42). Global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were calculated as the mean of the regional strains across the entire LV for both modalities. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses were used for comparisons. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the 4DCT-derived strains. RESULTS: The 4DCT-derived regional strains correlated well with the CMR-derived regional strains ( ε c c ${\epsilon }_{cc}$ : r = 0.76, p < 0.001; ε l l ${\epsilon }_{ll}$ : r = 0.64, p < 0.001). A very strong correlation was found between 4DCT-derived GCS and 4DCT-derived EF (r = -0.96; p < 0.001). The 4DCT-derived strains were also highly reproducible, with very low inter- and intraobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficients in the range of [0.92, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel method to estimate high-resolution regional LV endocardial circumferential and longitudinal strains from 4DCT images. Except for the definition of the mitral valve and LV outflow tract planes, the method is completely user independent, thus yielding highly reproducible estimates of endocardial strain. The 4DCT-derived strains correlated well with those estimated using a commercial CMR feature tracking software. The promising results reported in this study highlight the potential utility of 4DCT in the precise assessment of regional cardiac function for the management of cardiac disease.
BACKGROUND: Estimates of regional left ventricular (LV) strains provide additional information to global function parameters such as ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) and are more sensitive in detecting abnormal regional cardiac function. The accurate and reproducible assessment of regional cardiac function has implications in the management of various cardiac diseases such as heart failure, myocardial ischemia, and dyssynchrony. PURPOSE: To develop a method that yields highly reproducible, high-resolution estimates of regional endocardial strains from 4DCT images. METHODS: A method for estimating regional LV endocardial circumferential ( ε c c ) $( {{\epsilon }_{cc}} )$ and longitudinal ( ε l l ${\epsilon }_{ll}$ ) strains from 4DCT was developed. Point clouds representing the LV endocardial surface were extracted for each time frame of the cardiac cycle from 4DCT images. 3D deformation fields across the cardiac cycle were obtained by registering the end diastolic point cloud to each subsequent point cloud in time across the cardiac cycle using a 3D point-set registration technique. From these deformation fields, ε c c and ε l l ${\epsilon }_{cc}\ {\rm{and\ }}{\epsilon }_{ll}$ were estimated over the entire LV endocardial surface by fitting an affine transformation with maximum likelihood estimation. The 4DCT-derived strains were compared with strains estimated in the same subjects by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); twenty-four subjects had CMR scans followed by 4DCT scans acquired within a few hours. Regional LV circumferential and longitudinal strains were estimated from the CMR images using a commercially available feature tracking software (cvi42). Global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were calculated as the mean of the regional strains across the entire LV for both modalities. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses were used for comparisons. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the 4DCT-derived strains. RESULTS: The 4DCT-derived regional strains correlated well with the CMR-derived regional strains ( ε c c ${\epsilon }_{cc}$ : r = 0.76, p < 0.001; ε l l ${\epsilon }_{ll}$ : r = 0.64, p < 0.001). A very strong correlation was found between 4DCT-derived GCS and 4DCT-derived EF (r = -0.96; p < 0.001). The 4DCT-derived strains were also highly reproducible, with very low inter- and intraobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficients in the range of [0.92, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel method to estimate high-resolution regional LV endocardial circumferential and longitudinal strains from 4DCT images. Except for the definition of the mitral valve and LV outflow tract planes, the method is completely user independent, thus yielding highly reproducible estimates of endocardial strain. The 4DCT-derived strains correlated well with those estimated using a commercial CMR feature tracking software. The promising results reported in this study highlight the potential utility of 4DCT in the precise assessment of regional cardiac function for the management of cardiac disease.
Authors: Thomas J Stocker; Simon Deseive; Jonathon Leipsic; Martin Hadamitzky; Marcus Y Chen; Ronen Rubinshtein; Mathias Heckner; Jeroen J Bax; Xiang-Ming Fang; Erik Lerkevang Grove; John Lesser; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; James Otton; Sanghoon Shin; Gianluca Pontone; Hugo Marques; Benjamin Chow; Cesar H Nomura; Ramzi Tabbalat; Axel Schmermund; Joon-Won Kang; Christopher Naoum; Melany Atkins; Eugenio Martuscelli; Steffen Massberg; Jörg Hausleiter Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Amir Pourmorteza; Karl H Schuleri; Daniel A Herzka; Albert C Lardo; Elliot R McVeigh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Davis M Vigneault; Francisco Contijoch; Christopher P Bridge; Katherine Lowe; Chelsea Jan; Elliot R McVeigh Journal: Funct Imaging Model Heart Date: 2021-06-18
Authors: Kenneth Mangion; David Carrick; Jaclyn Carberry; Ahmed Mahrous; Christie McComb; Keith G Oldroyd; Hany Eteiba; Mitchell Lindsay; Margaret McEntegart; Stuart Hood; Mark C Petrie; Stuart Watkins; Andrew Davie; Xiaodong Zhong; Frederick H Epstein; Caroline E Haig; Colin Berry Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Francisco J Contijoch; Daniel W Groves; Zhennong Chen; Marcus Y Chen; Elliot R McVeigh Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Ying Zhang; David Mui; Julio A Chirinos; Payman Zamani; Victor A Ferrari; Yucheng Chen; Yuchi Han Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Boyang Liu; Ahmed M Dardeer; William E Moody; Manvir K Hayer; Shanat Baig; Anna M Price; Francisco Leyva; Nicola C Edwards; Richard P Steeds Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 2.357