Literature DB >> 27118151

Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Sara V Flanagan1, Steven E Spayd2, Nicholas A Procopio3, Steven N Chillrud4, Stuart Braman5, Yan Zheng6.   

Abstract

Regularly ingesting water with elevated arsenic increases adverse health risks. Since September 2002, the NJ Private Well Testing Act (PWTA) has required testing untreated well water for arsenic during real estate transactions in 12 counties. Its implementation provides an opportunity to investigate the effects of policy intervention on well testing and treatment behavior. Here we analyze results of a survey mailed to 1943 random addresses (37% response), including responses from 502 private well households who purchased their homes prior to PWTA commencement and 168 who purchased after. We find the PWTA has significantly increased arsenic testing rates in an area where 21% of wells contain arsenic above the 5μg/L NJ drinking water standard. The PWTA has allowed identification of more wells with arsenic (20% of post-PWTA vs. 4% of pre-PWTA households) and more treatment for arsenic (19% of post-PWTA vs. 3% of pre-PWTA households). Such an Act is a partial answer to significant socioeconomic disparities in testing observed among households for whom it is not required. Additionally residents purchasing homes since 2002 are younger and disproportionately more likely to have children in their household (60% vs. 32%), a priority group given their particular vulnerability to effects of arsenic. Despite more wells tested under the PWTA, post-PWTA well owners forget or misremember arsenic test results more often, are more likely to report not knowing what kind of treatment they are using, and are not reporting better maintenance or monitoring of their treatment systems than pre-PWTA households. This suggests serious challenges to reducing arsenic exposure remain even when testing is a requirement. Furthermore, only a fraction of wells have been tested under the PWTA due to the slow pace of housing turnover. We recommend more public resources be made available to support private well testing among socially and biologically vulnerable groups.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Behavior; Drinking water; New Jersey; Policy; Private well testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118151      PMCID: PMC5204457          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  24 in total

1.  Significance of private water supply wells in a rural Nevada area as a route of exposure to aqueous arsenic.

Authors:  Mark Walker; Marnee Benson; W Douglass Shaw
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 2.  Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency.

Authors:  A H Smith; E O Lingas; M Rahman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of arsenic screening promotion in private wells: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Jolianne Renaud; Fabien Gagnon; Cécile Michaud; Sonia Boivin
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.483

4.  Acute myocardial infarction mortality in comparison with lung and bladder cancer mortality in arsenic-exposed region II of Chile from 1950 to 2000.

Authors:  Yan Yuan; Guillermo Marshall; Catterina Ferreccio; Craig Steinmaus; Steve Selvin; Jane Liaw; Michael N Bates; Allan H Smith
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Robert A Johnston; Qiang Yang; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; James Ross; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Health effects of arsenic and chromium in drinking water: recent human findings.

Authors:  Allan H Smith; Craig M Steinmaus
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Assessing arsenic exposure in households using bottled water or point-of-use treatment systems to mitigate well water contamination.

Authors:  Andrew E Smith; Rebecca A Lincoln; Chris Paulu; Thomas L Simones; Kathleen L Caldwell; Robert L Jones; Lorraine C Backer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  A cross-sectional study of well water arsenic and child IQ in Maine schoolchildren.

Authors:  Gail A Wasserman; Xinhua Liu; Nancy J Loiacono; Jennie Kline; Pam Factor-Litvak; Alexander van Geen; Jacob L Mey; Diane Levy; Richard Abramson; Amy Schwartz; Joseph H Graziano
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  18 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Stuart Braman; Steven N Chillrud; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 3.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

4.  Private-well stewardship among a general population based sample of private well-owners.

Authors:  Kristen M C Malecki; Amy A Schultz; Dolores J Severtson; Henry A Anderson; James A VanDerslice
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; James Ross; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Denis R LeBlanc; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Mary C Cardon; Jimmy M Clark; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.352

8.  Recommended Sampling Intervals for Arsenic in Private Wells.

Authors:  Brian J Mailloux; Nicholas A Procopio; Mark Bakker; Therese Chen; Imtiaz Choudhury; Kazi Matin Ahmed; M Rajib H Mozumder; Tyler Ellis; Steve Chillrud; Alexander van Geen
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Leveraging Health Care Communication Channels for Environmental Health Outreach in New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Stuart Braman; Rose Puelle; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Geralyn Prosswimmer; Ana Navas-Acien; Joseph Graziano; Steve Chillrud
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec

10.  Hazard Ranking Method for Populations Exposed to Arsenic in Private Water Supplies: Relation to Bedrock Geology.

Authors:  Helen Crabbe; Tony Fletcher; Rebecca Close; Michael J Watts; E Louise Ander; Pauline L Smedley; Neville Q Verlander; Martin Gregory; Daniel R S Middleton; David A Polya; Mike Studden; Giovanni S Leonardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.