Literature DB >> 33752165

Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Paul M Bradley1, Denis R LeBlanc2, Kristin M Romanok3, Kelly L Smalling3, Michael J Focazio4, Mary C Cardon5, Jimmy M Clark6, Justin M Conley5, Nicola Evans5, Carrie E Givens7, James L Gray8, L Earl Gray5, Phillip C Hartig5, Christopher P Higgins9, Michelle L Hladik10, Luke R Iwanowicz11, Keith A Loftin12, R Blaine McCleskey13, Carrie A McDonough14, Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley5, Christopher P Weis15, Vickie S Wilson5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Humans are primary drivers of environmental contamination worldwide, including in drinking-water resources. In the United States (US), federal and state agencies regulate and monitor public-supply drinking water while private-supply monitoring is rare; the current lack of directly comparable information on contaminant-mixture exposures and risks between private- and public-supplies undermines tapwater (TW) consumer decision-making.
METHODS: We compared private- and public-supply residential point-of-use TW at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, where both supplies share the same groundwater source. TW from 10 private- and 10 public-supply homes was analyzed for 487 organic, 38 inorganic, 8 microbial indicators, and 3 in vitro bioactivities. Concentrations were compared to existing protective health-based benchmarks, and aggregated Hazard Indices (HI) of regulated and unregulated TW contaminants were calculated along with ratios of in vitro exposure-activity cutoffs.
RESULTS: Seventy organic and 28 inorganic constituents were detected in TW. Median detections were comparable, but median cumulative concentrations were substantially higher in public supply due to 6 chlorine-disinfected samples characterized by disinfection byproducts and corresponding lower heterotrophic plate counts. Public-supply applicable maximum contaminant (nitrate) and treatment action (lead and copper) levels were exceeded in private-supply TW samples only. Exceedances of health-based HI screening levels of concern were common to both TW supplies. DISCUSSION: These Cape Cod results indicate comparable cumulative human-health concerns from contaminant exposures in private- and public-supply TW in a shared source-water setting. Importantly, although this study's analytical coverage exceeds that currently feasible for water purveyors or homeowners, it nevertheless is a substantial underestimation of the full breadth of contaminant mixtures documented in the environment and potentially present in drinking water.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of the supply, increased public engagement in source-water protection and drinking-water treatment, including consumer point-of-use treatment, is warranted to reduce risks associated with long-term TW contaminant exposures, especially in vulnerable populations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disinfection byproducts; Human health; Inorganics; Organics; Private supply; Public supply; Sole-source aquifer; Tapwater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752165      PMCID: PMC8268049          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   13.352


  123 in total

1.  Pharmaceuticals, perfluorosurfactants, and other organic wastewater compounds in public drinking water wells in a shallow sand and gravel aquifer.

Authors:  Laurel A Schaider; Ruthann A Rudel; Janet M Ackerman; Sarah C Dunagan; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  An "EAR" on Environmental Surveillance and Monitoring: A Case Study on the Use of Exposure-Activity Ratios (EARs) to Prioritize Sites, Chemicals, and Bioactivities of Concern in Great Lakes Waters.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Steven R Corsi; Laura A DeCicco; Keith A Houck; Richard S Judson; Shibin Li; Matthew T Martin; Elizabeth Murphy; Anthony L Schroeder; Edwin R Smith; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  What's wrong with the tap? Examining perceptions of tap water and bottled water at Purdue University.

Authors:  Amber Saylor; Linda Stalker Prokopy; Shannon Amberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Genotoxicity of disinfection byproducts and disinfected waters: A review of recent literature.

Authors:  Constanza Cortés; Ricard Marcos
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 5.  Contamination, bioaccumulation and toxic effects of perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) in the water environment: a review paper.

Authors:  Fatihah Suja; Biplob Kumar Pramanik; Shahrom Md Zain
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

6.  Disparities in plain, tap and bottled water consumption among US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2014.

Authors:  Asher Y Rosinger; Kirsten A Herrick; Amber Y Wutich; Jonathan S Yoder; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  De Facto Water Reuse: Bioassay suite approach delivers depth and breadth in endocrine active compound detection.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Medlock Kakaley; Brett R Blackwell; Mary C Cardon; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; David J Feifarek; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Dana W Kolpin; Marc A Mills; Laura Rosenblum; Daniel L Villeneuve; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 10.753

8.  Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Maria Argos; Dana W Kolpin; Shannon M Meppelink; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Joshua M Allen; Julie E Dietze; Michael J Devito; Ariel R Donovan; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Rachael F Lane; Zachary R Laughrey; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; Michael T Meyer; Andrea R Putz; Susan D Richardson; Alan E Stark; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson; Abderrahman Zehraoui
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 10.753

9.  Applying a cumulative risk framework to drinking water assessment: a commentary.

Authors:  Tasha Stoiber; Alexis Temkin; David Andrews; Chris Campbell; Olga V Naidenko
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sara V Flanagan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater Used as a Source of Drinking Water in the Eastern United States.

Authors:  Peter B McMahon; Andrea K Tokranov; Laura M Bexfield; Bruce D Lindsey; Tyler D Johnson; Melissa A Lombard; Elise Watson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 9.028

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.