BACKGROUND: Humans are primary drivers of environmental contamination worldwide, including in drinking-water resources. In the United States (US), federal and state agencies regulate and monitor public-supply drinking water while private-supply monitoring is rare; the current lack of directly comparable information on contaminant-mixture exposures and risks between private- and public-supplies undermines tapwater (TW) consumer decision-making. METHODS: We compared private- and public-supply residential point-of-use TW at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, where both supplies share the same groundwater source. TW from 10 private- and 10 public-supply homes was analyzed for 487 organic, 38 inorganic, 8 microbial indicators, and 3 in vitro bioactivities. Concentrations were compared to existing protective health-based benchmarks, and aggregated Hazard Indices (HI) of regulated and unregulated TW contaminants were calculated along with ratios of in vitro exposure-activity cutoffs. RESULTS: Seventy organic and 28 inorganic constituents were detected in TW. Median detections were comparable, but median cumulative concentrations were substantially higher in public supply due to 6 chlorine-disinfected samples characterized by disinfection byproducts and corresponding lower heterotrophic plate counts. Public-supply applicable maximum contaminant (nitrate) and treatment action (lead and copper) levels were exceeded in private-supply TW samples only. Exceedances of health-based HI screening levels of concern were common to both TW supplies. DISCUSSION: These Cape Cod results indicate comparable cumulative human-health concerns from contaminant exposures in private- and public-supply TW in a shared source-water setting. Importantly, although this study's analytical coverage exceeds that currently feasible for water purveyors or homeowners, it nevertheless is a substantial underestimation of the full breadth of contaminant mixtures documented in the environment and potentially present in drinking water. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the supply, increased public engagement in source-water protection and drinking-water treatment, including consumer point-of-use treatment, is warranted to reduce risks associated with long-term TW contaminant exposures, especially in vulnerable populations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Humans are primary drivers of environmental contamination worldwide, including in drinking-water resources. In the United States (US), federal and state agencies regulate and monitor public-supply drinking water while private-supply monitoring is rare; the current lack of directly comparable information on contaminant-mixture exposures and risks between private- and public-supplies undermines tapwater (TW) consumer decision-making. METHODS: We compared private- and public-supply residential point-of-use TW at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, where both supplies share the same groundwater source. TW from 10 private- and 10 public-supply homes was analyzed for 487 organic, 38 inorganic, 8 microbial indicators, and 3 in vitro bioactivities. Concentrations were compared to existing protective health-based benchmarks, and aggregated Hazard Indices (HI) of regulated and unregulated TW contaminants were calculated along with ratios of in vitro exposure-activity cutoffs. RESULTS: Seventy organic and 28 inorganic constituents were detected in TW. Median detections were comparable, but median cumulative concentrations were substantially higher in public supply due to 6 chlorine-disinfected samples characterized by disinfection byproducts and corresponding lower heterotrophic plate counts. Public-supply applicable maximum contaminant (nitrate) and treatment action (lead and copper) levels were exceeded in private-supply TW samples only. Exceedances of health-based HI screening levels of concern were common to both TW supplies. DISCUSSION: These Cape Cod results indicate comparable cumulative human-health concerns from contaminant exposures in private- and public-supply TW in a shared source-water setting. Importantly, although this study's analytical coverage exceeds that currently feasible for water purveyors or homeowners, it nevertheless is a substantial underestimation of the full breadth of contaminant mixtures documented in the environment and potentially present in drinking water. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the supply, increased public engagement in source-water protection and drinking-water treatment, including consumer point-of-use treatment, is warranted to reduce risks associated with long-term TW contaminant exposures, especially in vulnerable populations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Disinfection byproducts; Human health; Inorganics; Organics; Private supply; Public supply; Sole-source aquifer; Tapwater
Authors: Laurel A Schaider; Ruthann A Rudel; Janet M Ackerman; Sarah C Dunagan; Julia Green Brody Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Steven R Corsi; Laura A DeCicco; Keith A Houck; Richard S Judson; Shibin Li; Matthew T Martin; Elizabeth Murphy; Anthony L Schroeder; Edwin R Smith; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Asher Y Rosinger; Kirsten A Herrick; Amber Y Wutich; Jonathan S Yoder; Cynthia L Ogden Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Elizabeth K Medlock Kakaley; Brett R Blackwell; Mary C Cardon; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; David J Feifarek; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Dana W Kolpin; Marc A Mills; Laura Rosenblum; Daniel L Villeneuve; Vickie S Wilson Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 10.753
Authors: Paul M Bradley; Maria Argos; Dana W Kolpin; Shannon M Meppelink; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Joshua M Allen; Julie E Dietze; Michael J Devito; Ariel R Donovan; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Rachael F Lane; Zachary R Laughrey; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; Michael T Meyer; Andrea R Putz; Susan D Richardson; Alan E Stark; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson; Abderrahman Zehraoui Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 10.753
Authors: Peter B McMahon; Andrea K Tokranov; Laura M Bexfield; Bruce D Lindsey; Tyler D Johnson; Melissa A Lombard; Elise Watson Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 9.028