Literature DB >> 32483831

Recommended Sampling Intervals for Arsenic in Private Wells.

Brian J Mailloux, Nicholas A Procopio1, Mark Bakker2, Therese Chen3, Imtiaz Choudhury4, Kazi Matin Ahmed4, M Rajib H Mozumder5, Tyler Ellis5, Steve Chillrud5, Alexander van Geen5.   

Abstract

Geogenic arsenic in drinking water is a worldwide problem. For private well owners, testing (e.g., private or government laboratory) is the main method to determine arsenic concentration. However, the temporal variability of arsenic concentrations is not well characterized and it is not clear how often private wells should be tested. To answer this question, three datasets, two new and one publicly available, with temporal arsenic data were utilized: 6370 private wells from New Jersey tested at least twice since 2002, 2174 wells from the USGS NAWQA database, and 391 private wells sampled 14 years apart from Bangladesh. Two arsenic drinking water standards are used for the analysis: 10 µg/L, the WHO guideline and EPA standard or maximum contaminant level (MCL) and 5 µg/L, the New Jersey MCL. A rate of change was determined for each well and these rates were used to predict the temporal change in arsenic for a range of initial arsenic concentrations below an MCL. For each MCL and initial concentration, the probability of exceeding an MCL over time was predicted. Results show that to limit a person to below a 5% chance of drinking water above an MCL, wells that are ½ an MCL and above should be tested every year and wells below ½ an MCL should be tested every 5 years. These results indicate that one test result below an MCL is inadequate to ensure long-term compliance. Future recommendations should account for temporal variability when creating drinking water standards and guidance for private well owners.
© 2020, National Ground Water Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32483831      PMCID: PMC8055375          DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  32 in total

1.  Glacial sediment causing regional-scale elevated arsenic in drinking water.

Authors:  Melinda L Erickson; Randal J Barnes
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Temporal variability of groundwater chemistry in shallow and deep aquifers of Araihazar, Bangladesh.

Authors:  R K Dhar; Y Zheng; M Stute; A van Geen; Z Cheng; M Shanewaz; M Shamsudduha; M A Hoque; M W Rahman; K M Ahmed
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Domestic well locations and populations served in the contiguous U.S.: 1990.

Authors:  Tyler D Johnson; Kenneth Belitz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Field testing of over 30,000 wells for arsenic across 400 villages of the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: Implications for prioritizing mitigation.

Authors:  Alexander van Geen; Abida Farooqi; Anand Kumar; Junaid Ali Khattak; Nisbah Mushtaq; Ishtiaque Hussain; Tyler Ellis; Chander Kumar Singh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Migration of As, and (3)H/(3)He ages, in groundwater from West Bengal: Implications for monitoring.

Authors:  J M McArthur; D M Banerjee; S Sengupta; P Ravenscroft; S Klump; A Sarkar; B Disch; R Kipfer
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Robert A Johnston; Qiang Yang; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Evaluation of an arsenic test kit for rapid well screening in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Christine Marie George; Yan Zheng; Joseph H Graziano; Shahriar Bin Rasul; Zakir Hossain; Jacob L Mey; Alexander van Geen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Retardation of arsenic transport through a Pleistocene aquifer.

Authors:  Alexander van Geen; Benjamín C Bostick; Thi Kim Trang Pham; Mai Lan Vi; Mai Nguyen-Ngoc; Dao Manh Phu; Hung Viet Pham; Kathleen Radloff; Zahid Aziz; Jacob L Mey; Mason O Stahl; Charles F Harvey; Peter Oates; Beth Weinman; Caroline Stengel; Felix Frei; Rolf Kipfer; Michael Berg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.