Literature DB >> 26674699

Assessing arsenic exposure in households using bottled water or point-of-use treatment systems to mitigate well water contamination.

Andrew E Smith1, Rebecca A Lincoln2, Chris Paulu3, Thomas L Simones2, Kathleen L Caldwell4, Robert L Jones4, Lorraine C Backer5.   

Abstract

There is little published literature on the efficacy of strategies to reduce exposure to residential well water arsenic. The objectives of our study were to: 1) determine if water arsenic remained a significant exposure source in households using bottled water or point-of-use treatment systems; and 2) evaluate the major sources and routes of any remaining arsenic exposure. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 167 households in Maine using one of these two strategies to prevent exposure to arsenic. Most households included one adult and at least one child. Untreated well water arsenic concentrations ranged from <10 μg/L to 640 μg/L. Urine samples, water samples, daily diet and bathing diaries, and household dietary and water use habit surveys were collected. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the relationship between urinary arsenic and untreated well water arsenic concentration, while accounting for documented consumption of untreated water and dietary sources. If mitigation strategies were fully effective, there should be no relationship between urinary arsenic and well water arsenic. To the contrary, we found that untreated arsenic water concentration remained a significant (p ≤ 0.001) predictor of urinary arsenic levels. When untreated water arsenic concentrations were <40 μg/L, untreated water arsenic was no longer a significant predictor of urinary arsenic. Time spent bathing (alone or in combination with water arsenic concentration) was not associated with urinary arsenic. A predictive analysis of the average study participant suggested that when untreated water arsenic ranged from 100 to 500 μg/L, elimination of any untreated water use would result in an 8%-32% reduction in urinary arsenic for young children, and a 14%-59% reduction for adults. These results demonstrate the importance of complying with a point-of-use or bottled water exposure reduction strategy. However, there remained unexplained, water-related routes of exposure.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Bathing; Bottled water; Children; Point-of-use; Well water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674699      PMCID: PMC4747806          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  21 in total

Review 1.  Analysis and design issues for studies using censored biomarker measurements with an example of viral load measurements in HIV clinical trials.

Authors:  M D Hughes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Rice consumption contributes to arsenic exposure in US women.

Authors:  Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Kathryn L Cottingham; Joann F Gruber; Tracy Punshon; Vicki Sayarath; A Jay Gandolfi; Emily R Baker; Brian P Jackson; Carol L Folt; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Seafood intake and urine concentrations of total arsenic, dimethylarsinate and arsenobetaine in the US population.

Authors:  Ana Navas-Acien; Kevin A Francesconi; Ellen K Silbergeld; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.

Authors:  K M Flegal; P M Keyl; F J Nieto
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Dietary assessment resource manual.

Authors:  F E Thompson; T Byers
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Arsenic in groundwater in eastern New England: occurrence, controls, and human health implications.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Denise L Montgomery; Sarah M Flanagan; Keith W Robinson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Arsenic in groundwaters in the Northern Appalachian Mountain belt: a review of patterns and processes.

Authors:  Stephen C Peters
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  The absorption and excretion of fluoride and arsenic in humans.

Authors:  Yujian Zheng; Jiyao Wu; Jack C Ng; Guoquan Wang; Wu Lian
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Lynn C Wilder; Samuel P Caudill; Amanda J Gonzalez; Lance L Needham; James L Pirkle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Reduction in urinary arsenic with bottled-water intervention.

Authors:  Arun B Josyula; Hannah McClellen; Tracy A Hysong; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Gerald S Poplin; Stefan Stürup; Jefferey L Burgess
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.000

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness of table top water pitcher filters to remove arsenic from drinking water.

Authors:  Roxanna Barnaby; Amanda Liefeld; Brian P Jackson; Thomas H Hampton; Bruce A Stanton
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Stuart Braman; Steven N Chillrud; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.840

3.  Low-level arsenic exposure from drinking water is associated with prostate cancer in Iowa.

Authors:  Taehyun Roh; Charles F Lynch; Peter Weyer; Kai Wang; Kevin M Kelly; Gabriele Ludewig
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Defining drinking water metal contaminant mixture risk by coupling zebrafish behavioral analysis with citizen science.

Authors:  Remy Babich; Emily Craig; Abigail Muscat; Jane Disney; Anna Farrell; Linda Silka; Nishad Jayasundara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Historical exposure to chemicals reduces tolerance to novel chemical stress in Daphnia (waterflea).

Authors:  Muhammad Abdullahi; Jiarui Zhou; Vignesh Dandhapani; Anurag Chaturvedi; Luisa Orsini
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.622

7.  The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sara V Flanagan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.